Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Clears NASA to Buy Russian Spaceships
Space.com ^ | 21 September 2005 | Brian Berger

Posted on 09/22/2005 8:56:22 AM PDT by Dan Evans

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Senate approved Sept. 21 a bill that would clear the way for NASA to buy the Russian Soyuz vehicles it needs to continue to occupy the International Space Station beyond this year.

The bill was introduced Sept. 15 by Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) to provide temporary relief from provisions in the Iran Nonproliferation Act of 2000 that bar U.S. purchases of Russian human spaceflight hardware as long as Russia continues to help Iran in its pursuit of nuclear know-how and advanced weapons technology.

Lugar’s bill, S. 1713, changes the law to permit NASA to buy any Russian space hardware or services it needs for the International Space Station program until 2012.

The bill was approved the morning of Sept. 21 by unanimous consent, a Senate procedure that allows non-controversial legislation to bypass a floor vote.

The U.S. House of Representatives also is considering amending the Iran Nonproliferation Act to permit NASA to buy Soyuz vehicles, but it has yet to take any legislative action.

The House could either pick up and pass the Senate’s bill or introduce a bill of its own that would have to be reconciled with the Senate version before becoming law.

Without relief from the Iran act, NASA could soon find itself unable to send its astronauts to the space station for extended stays. A Soyuz capsule set to carry a new two-person crew – and one space tourist – to the station Sept. 30 is the last one Russia is obligated to provide at no charge to the United States under a bilateral agreement.

NASA and the U.S. State Department formally asked Congress in June to amend the Iran act to permit the United States to make use of Russian space technology in its space exploration plans.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: cafta; nafta; nasa; outsourcing; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
NASA wants to buy spaceships from Russia. How embarrassing.
1 posted on 09/22/2005 8:56:25 AM PDT by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

Why is it embarassing?

It's not like the Russians are novices in space.


2 posted on 09/22/2005 8:59:15 AM PDT by Sometimes A River ("The leaves have broken on Lake Ponktran" - WKAT 1360 AM Miami Newsreader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

Soon we'll be outsourcing the government?


3 posted on 09/22/2005 8:59:20 AM PDT by Realism (Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; minerboy; anymouse; KevinDavis; Spiff

ping


4 posted on 09/22/2005 9:00:33 AM PDT by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

Tangently related; anyone ever see the Russian version of the FamiCom (NES to us in the states)? It's the ugliest thing I'd ever seen. The Russians have no sense of asthetics.


5 posted on 09/22/2005 9:01:01 AM PDT by ClaudiusI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Acts 2:38

Why is it embarassing?

It's not like the Russians are novices in space.

---

What is embarassing is that WE should be able to do this by our selves. Instead NASA is stuck on stupid because of top heavy thinking. NASA needs to get out of the administration mode and let the engineers loose!


6 posted on 09/22/2005 9:01:37 AM PDT by BoBToMatoE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BoBToMatoE

I'm no big fan of NASA but if they can find something better and cheaper, let them do it.

Gov't doesn't exist to "create jobs," contrary to what many Republicans think.


7 posted on 09/22/2005 9:04:11 AM PDT by Sometimes A River ("The leaves have broken on Lake Ponktran" - WKAT 1360 AM Miami Newsreader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
The U.S. House of Representatives also is considering amending the Iran Nonproliferation Act to permit NASA to buy Soyuz vehicles

Don't know what nonproliferation of Iran has to do with Soyuz, but, the House has lower qualifications for membership.

8 posted on 09/22/2005 9:06:35 AM PDT by RightWhale (We in heep dip trubble)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BoBToMatoE
NASA needs to get out of the administration mode and let the engineers loose!

NASA didn't learn that after Challenger. I doubt it will happen now.

9 posted on 09/22/2005 9:06:46 AM PDT by manwiththehands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

*sigh* Looks like the end of an era.


10 posted on 09/22/2005 9:08:48 AM PDT by Dallas59 (“You love life, while we love death.” - Al-Qaeda / Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Acts 2:38
Why is it embarassing?

It's embarrassing because we should be making our own spacecraft and because NASA is considering doing business with a regime that is doing joint military exercises with China.

11 posted on 09/22/2005 9:12:37 AM PDT by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

Buying Russian spaceships? Why, is there a shortage of cast iron in this country?


12 posted on 09/22/2005 9:14:32 AM PDT by LIConFem (A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Acts 2:38
Gov't doesn't exist to "create jobs," contrary to what many Republicans think.

It certainly doesn't. But, I have a bad feeling about this. Of course they're not novices in space, but for us to rely on them for transportation to the ISS sounds like a bad idea. I'd no sooner want to rely on them for military aircraft. If we can't manufacture and provide our own spare parts, I get the willies. I'm sure it's a reasonable stopgap measure, but let's not take it too far.
13 posted on 09/22/2005 9:15:38 AM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Acts 2:38

America used to be the leader in final frontier technology. Now we've been reduced to buying equipment from our competitor. It's embarassing.


14 posted on 09/22/2005 9:16:00 AM PDT by Rebelbase (The Mainstream Media is "Stuck on stupid". (Gen. Honore))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Acts 2:38
Gov't doesn't exist to "create jobs," contrary to what many Republicans think.

NASA was created to develop our aerospace technology not to develop Russia's aerospace technology.

15 posted on 09/22/2005 9:16:21 AM PDT by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Realism

"Soon we'll be outsourcing the government?"

We already ARE....with the signing of EVERY new "TREATY"....such as GATT, CAFTA, amd NAFTA.


16 posted on 09/22/2005 9:16:24 AM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

Just shut NASA down - this organization is a national disgrace and continues to be a shame for all Americans.

Shut it down.

Start over.

Let the private sector do it - if the government want to play - then write checks and demand results.


17 posted on 09/22/2005 9:18:19 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

There goes that giant sucking sound again, and no, that sound is not caused by an american built rocket. This time it is rocket scientists losing their jobs. The outsourcing continues. [sigh]


18 posted on 09/22/2005 9:18:45 AM PDT by Kevin OMalley (No, not Freeper#95235, Freeper #1165: Charter member, What Was My Login Club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Acts 2:38
I'm no big fan of NASA but if they can find something better and cheaper, let them do it

Groovy. The Chinese built Long March launch vehicle can be substituted for all U.S. launch vehicles; it works OK, most of the time. They can now orbit people too. That works most of the time as well. What's a little wreck or two occasionally? The U.S. does it.

Hell, they can build and fly pretty much anything we can, given a couple of years to copy something. Why slow them down, for that matter? Just hand over the blueprints, let them do it all - military space, aeronautics, everything! It'll all be "cheaper".

And we can get bureaucrats and politicians real cheap from them while we're at it - why not government by the Chinese Communists? They're efficient, hard working, effective at what they do (they don't waste time with niceties like "Trial by Jury" and other silly Anglo-Saxon concepts). Everything for a guy like you to be happy about!

Don't Worry, Be Happy! Surrender to your new ChiCom Contract government! You'll be happy you did....

19 posted on 09/22/2005 9:19:19 AM PDT by Regulator (Of Course, they might have a problem with a guy who uses Biblical references for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kevin OMalley
We can't even point our finger anymore.


20 posted on 09/22/2005 9:19:34 AM PDT by Rebelbase (The Mainstream Media is "Stuck on stupid". (Gen. Honore))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson