Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnnyM
Scientists somehow say that their view of creation and origins is fact, and not faith, when they have not observed it.

Do you understand the underlying basis for their conclusions, or are you going by the fallacy that if a phenomena is not 100% understood, it is not understood at all?
116 posted on 09/22/2005 10:32:46 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio
I understand that evolution is a theory based on evidence. We think it happened this way and here is why. What I do know is science has never observed creation and never observed a single cell organism evolving into a man or some other complex creatue and it has never observed macro evolution. Therefore any conclusions they make about the origin of man and the creation of the universe are at best educated guesses and believed on faith.

JM
123 posted on 09/22/2005 10:39:27 AM PDT by JohnnyM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson