[JohnnyM]

I understand that evolution is a theory based on evidence. We think it happened this way and here is why. What I do know is science has never observed creation and never observed a single cell organism evolving into a man or some other complex creatue and it has never observed macro evolution. Therefore any conclusions they make about the origin of man and the creation of the universe are at best educated guesses and believed on faith.

JM

[Vive ut Vivas]

I understand that evolution is a theory based on evidence. We think it happened this way and here is why.

Yes, exactly, so what's the problem?

What I do know is science has never observed creation and never observed a single cell organism evolving into a man or some other complex creatue and it has never observed macro evolution.

Science will never observe a single cell organism evolving into a man or some other complex creature directly. Instead, we observe the *evidence* that such has happened. "Macro Evolution" is a bogus term because there is no divider between "micro evolution" and "macro evolution". I made a post with pictures about this once, I'll have to dig it up.

Therefore any conclusions they make about the origin of man and the creation of the universe are at best educated guesses and believed on faith.

No, they are not "at best educated guesses" or "believed on faith". I linked you to the List-O-Links which has mountains of evidences. A theory based on evidence is not believed on faith. I don't believe the theories of gravity or electrodynamics on faith. I don't have anything emotionally invested in their being true.