Reading the gun's specs proved to be more than intimidating; it was downright scary.
OOOOH mommie mommie the big bad looking weapon is scary let me hide under your skirt until the pee stains on my pants dry up and then lets ban the weapon so I will FEEL better cause i cant ever see a scary looking weapon again.This usleless puke needs to drop out of school and get the rest of his education at a san fransisco bathhouse.Hes going to end up there someday soon anyway.Oh yeah if you want to write to him and show him the error of his ways his email is
aslingwe@emich.edu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: Joe Brower; Travis McGee; hiredhand
2 posted on
09/20/2005 11:00:30 AM PDT by
freepatriot32
(Deep within every dilemma is a solution that involves explosives)
To: Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; Bernard; BJClinton; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
3 posted on
09/20/2005 11:01:54 AM PDT by
freepatriot32
(Deep within every dilemma is a solution that involves explosives)
To: freepatriot32
4 posted on
09/20/2005 11:03:00 AM PDT by
JJR RNCH
(Its only funny until someone gets hurt, then its hilarious.)
To: freepatriot32
Where do I mail the diapers?
5 posted on
09/20/2005 11:03:19 AM PDT by
M203M4
To: freepatriot32
Wow! $7000 for a rifle with a 10-round magazine. And he was able to write that much on it.
Kind of pales in comparison to the fact that for under $1000 you could buy enough fertilizer, diesel fuel, and rent a U-haul that could kill many more people than that rifle. What a dumba$$.
6 posted on
09/20/2005 11:04:16 AM PDT by
proud_yank
(Socialism is economic oppression)
To: freepatriot32
I have just inherited a little money looking at a new socom m1a, new 1911 (springfield armory) and a .45 Long Colt Ruger Vaquero.
Just couldn't swing the 8 grand for the M82A1, and I doubt if the Police Departments in CA will be able to buy it or get it repaired at any price, from the factory.
7 posted on
09/20/2005 11:04:28 AM PDT by
dts32041
( Robin Hood, stealing from the government and giving back to tax payer. Where is he today?)
To: freepatriot32
Too accessible, my @$$ ...
The day I can go down to the corner hardware store and buy a brand-new, recent production full auto M4 carbine, at a free-market price, with no hassle, is the day that militaryr 'guns' are just barely accessible enough.
8 posted on
09/20/2005 11:04:58 AM PDT by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: freepatriot32
I always laugh at how these nuts go after the .50BMG, claiming how it can down a plane and perforate a nuclear reactor's shielding. LOL. For one it would be far easier, and cheaper even, to snap up one of the myriad manpads around the world if one needs to bring down a plane. It is far easier to down a plane with a missle from a manpad that with a miracle shot from a rifle ....and anyone who can shoot down a flying jetliner with a gun has skill levels bordering on super human. Oh, and as for the breaching of nuclear reactors .....ridiculous!
And poor Barrett. They always pick on the BMG yet forget about other 50 cal rifles like the BFG, as well as a plethora of foreign models from places like South Africa (pretty good one BTW) and the like.
But hey ....maybe one can only 'shoot down jetliners' using a Barrett BMG.
9 posted on
09/20/2005 11:04:59 AM PDT by
spetznaz
(Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
To: freepatriot32
Dear Adam:
Grow a pair.
Sincerely,
Flashbunny.
10 posted on
09/20/2005 11:05:08 AM PDT by
flashbunny
(Do you believe in the Constitution only until it keeps the government from doing what you want?)
To: freepatriot32
It's a beauty alright.
11 posted on
09/20/2005 11:05:30 AM PDT by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: freepatriot32
He is right, the weapon is extremely dangerous to those on the receiving end of it. That is why it should be available to citizens and not just the government.
I frankly can't see much use for it for me except for fun or war but so what? It is not up to him to decide what I can have.
12 posted on
09/20/2005 11:05:45 AM PDT by
yarddog
To: freepatriot32
Didn't the Supreme Court say a while back that a sawed-off shotgun could be banned as a civilian weapon based on the 2nd Amendment because it WAS NOT a military weapon?
You can't have it both ways.
14 posted on
09/20/2005 11:06:39 AM PDT by
chaosagent
(Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
To: freepatriot32
I want a M16M203 (aka the "Leetle Fren"). They have those at Wal-Mart yet?
:-D )))
16 posted on
09/20/2005 11:07:18 AM PDT by
RichInOC
("The coffee is strong at Cafe du Monde, the doughnuts are too hot to touch..." Save the Big Greasy!)
To: freepatriot32
Sure enough, the M82A1 was not created for civilian gamesmen. But then, neither was the second ammendment.
17 posted on
09/20/2005 11:07:49 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(We need a strict constructionist - not someone who plays shadow puppet theater with the Constitution)
To: freepatriot32
I have NO USE for a .50 Calibre rifle.
I can't see that far!
19 posted on
09/20/2005 11:08:20 AM PDT by
MortMan
(Mostly Harmless)
To: freepatriot32
Despite my firm agreement with the Second Amendment, there are specific cases where the right to bear certain arms is significantly more dangerous than what may happen if one could not.Well, which is it? Firm agreement or shallow cowardice?
21 posted on
09/20/2005 11:09:17 AM PDT by
asformeandformyhouse
(I was going to respond to your post, but I thought I better wait til your meds kicked in.)
To: freepatriot32
The Loons of the Left. Still just trying to disarm law-abiding Americans. Karl Marx would have wanted it that way...and they cannot even approach their anti-Second Amendment agenda with ANY intelligence...
22 posted on
09/20/2005 11:10:56 AM PDT by
EagleUSA
To: freepatriot32
What sets it apart from other .50 caliber rifles is the fact that it is not bolt action, but semiautomatic with a ten round clip. A clip huh?
23 posted on
09/20/2005 11:12:10 AM PDT by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: freepatriot32
28 posted on
09/20/2005 11:13:56 AM PDT by
planekT
(What a mess.)
To: freepatriot32
Mr. Slingwein:
We are all entitled to our own opinions. We are not entitled to our own facts. No .50 cal rifle has ever been shown to have killed anyone in the U.S. To the contrary, the only New Orleans business and home owners who were not the victims of looting after Katrina were those who stood guard with their own firearms. On the other hand, it can be successfully argued that you owe me Liberals politics played a major roll in the deaths suffered as a result of Hurricane Katrina.
Speaking of self-defense, the EMI HELLHOUND round fired by the MLG-140 has entered the market. The MLG-140 fires six rounds in three seconds at ranges up to 400 meters, effectively covering a minimum destruction area/zone of 20x60 meters. The primary specialized round for the MLG-140 is the MEI HELLHOUND (High Order Unbelievable Nasty Destructive Series) Round, or HELLHOUND 40mm Low Velocity Multi-Purpose Round.
Yours in better self-defense,
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson