Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LexBaird
DeVerre would have been very hard put to produce "The Tempest" from beneath the Auld Sod.

Oxfordians claim that de Vere, who died in 1604, had unpublished plays among his papers when he died, that were published and performed only after his death. No source for his plays was published after 1604, nor do any Shakespeare plays refer to events after 1604.

11 posted on 09/19/2005 10:43:35 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Plutarch
nor do any Shakespeare plays refer to events after 1604.

Macbeth is clearly a paean to James I, who took the throne only 9 months before the death of DeVerre. Among other things, the portrayal of witches as evil movers of fate is a catering to the fanaticism of James. Was Oxford channeled, to write a play probably first performed in 1606, complete with allusions to current events, two years after his death?

Likewise, the farewell scene at the end of Tempest makes clear reference to the theatre in which it is being performed and is a farewell for the playwright as much as for Prospero. Was this staging anticipated by the brilliant Oxford, to match a time a seven years after his demise? All the signs say Will both wrote and spoke the words.

13 posted on 09/19/2005 11:22:18 PM PDT by LexBaird (tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson