[SpringheelJack]

Don't think Ringo's worth it. I mean, I realize these people grew up during that time and are on a nostalgia buzz, but 50 years from now is anybody going to care?

[Stoat]

Don't think Ringo's worth it. I mean, I realize these people grew up during that time and are on a nostalgia buzz, but 50 years from now is anybody going to care?

Perhaps I would feel differently if I were a huge Beatles fan, but I can hardly imagine it.  The music may have been interesting at that particular moment in time, but I don't see an eternal value to it....certainly not worthy of this sort of preservation effort.  Preserve the music, that's fine.  But an old brick house?  I could see it (maybe) if it was the home of an absolutely 'essential' figure of profound historical significance, but the Beatles' drummer?   "pounding furry stoat head on table"

[battlegearboat]

Bullocks!

[StarSpangled]

Maybe that's what they said about Bach or Beethoven. Who cares. Tear it down.

[Caipirabob]

I wanted to introduce my children to some decent music and picked a selection of Beatles music, including "Yellow Submarine" and others. They listen to it non-stop now. I don't think you can kill classics, and Beatles stand out among most others as "classic".