Posted on 09/18/2005 4:50:22 PM PDT by RWR8189
With the shuttle fleet grounded and the International Space Station staffed by a skeleton crew, NASA is set to unveil plans on Monday to take people and cargo to the moon.
Even before the official announcement, there is criticism from Capitol Hill over the reported $100 billion cost of the lunar program, given U.S. government commitments to the Iraq war and the recovery from Hurricane Katrina.
"This plan is coming out at a time when the nation is facing significant budgetary challenges," Rep. Bart Gordon, a Tennessee Democrat on the House Science Committee, said in a statement. "Getting agreement to move forward on it is going to be heavy lifting in the current environment, and it's clear that strong presidential leadership will be needed."
To get astronauts back to the moon for the first time since the Apollo 17 mission in 1972, one team of designers envisioned an Apollo-style capsule sitting atop rockets fashioned from shuttle components, including the shuttle's massive external tank and solid rocket boosters. There would be a separate space vehicle to carry only cargo.
The Space.com Web site reported that this scenario was presented to White House officials last week before its formal unveiling to the public on Monday. The new $100 billion lunar program would begin in 2018 by landing four people on the moon for a seven-day stay, Space.com reported.
NASA officials could not be reached for comment on Sunday.
President's vision for space
President George W. Bush's plan to send Americans back to the moon by 2020 and eventually on to Mars has drawn skepticism since its unveiling in January 2004, less than a year after the Feb. 1, 2003, shuttle Columbia disaster.
Bush's Vision for Space Exploration called for the development of a system to replace the aging shuttles, a goal that appears even more important given problems with the shuttle fleet's return to flight.
The same problems with falling debris that doomed Columbia recurred in July with the launch of Discovery, prompting the grounding of the shuttle fleet even as Discovery continued to fly its mission. A September shuttle mission was delayed until November and then to March.
Some $1.1 billion damage by Hurricane Katrina to NASA facilities in Louisiana and Mississippi could push the launch date back further still.
Bush's plan also mandated the completion of the International Space Station, but without shuttles to do the heavy lifting, that process has been on hold. A pair of Russian vehicles--the space taxi Soyuz and the space delivery van Progress--have been ferrying people and material.
Since the fatal Columbia disaster, only two-person crews, rather than the normal three-person crews, have stayed aboard the station.
With the shuttles slated for retirement in 2010, NASA Administrator Michael Griffin has estimated that the number of construction flights to the station could be pared from its earlier estimate of 28 to 15.
Ditto! Ditto! Ditto!
Don't remember that one, but "Apollo 13" had a similar scene with Mrs. Lovell in the shower.
After all people really don't need all the money in their paychecks anyway.
"After all people really don't need all the money in their paychecks anyway."
Who do you think NASA employs? Who gets contracts?
Courtesy of EchoTalon
In the next missions the men will be staying home with the kids.
People on the government dole, whose paychecks are funded with money taken at the point of a gun.
Have you forgotten about the taxpayers?
Holy schnikeys... from 6 trillion to 7.5 trillion inside of 4 years... thatsalotta money.
Women have higher power-to-weight ratios and use both less space and fewer consumables than men. All of that seems to be a no brainer for the selection.
Start the young girls out as pilots early and see what you get!
I sure the boys will do just fine baking cakes and making cookies in school. :)
Might as well get back to the moon with that money rather than putzing around in low earth orbit with 20-year old shuttles.
"Have you forgotten about the taxpayers?"
I didnt realize that Lockheed Martin is on the "public dole".
I am a taxpayer. And I believe in space exploration strongly as does the President wisely so.
Think real hard about it ... where does the government get it's money from? The government is transferring money from the paychecks of those outside of the government, to those inside the government umbrella.
The notion that government workers pay taxes is just a shell game to dupe honest taxpayers. The government pays them with one hand at the same time taking a a kickback with the other, and claiming taxes were paid.
.
BUSH =
The LIBERTY Century on Earth
BUSH =
The LIBERTY Century on Mars
.
$15 billion a year is what it's been and what it will be. $100 billion in 12 years, which is three Presidential terms by the way, means NASA won't be giving the moon program its full attention, but only about 1/2. The FedGov could withdraw from the 1967 Treaty and firm up the legal environment and private industry could take care of business at no [in our imaginary ideal world] taxpayer cost.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.