That being said, your theory was based upon unprovable assumptions. I pointed that out and you claim that I must be unobservant or stupid. I don't appreciate your insinuations or accusations.
Now would you like to take a stab at answering the questions? Or will you continue to dissemble?
Where did this large population of single cell organisms come from? Did they evolve? Or were they created?
If they must have evolved, then evolutionary theory is dependent upon abiogenesis. So you need to prove your theory from the ground up. You however are building your theory from the sky down. Hence, you have no foundation.
I will patiently await either your thoughtful response or your vile personal insult. It's your choice.
I made no insinuation, and no accusation.
I made a fully repeatable set of observations of recorded behavior, developed four competing and one inclusive hypotheses, and asked you to select one of them or provide others.
as to your questions:
"Where did this large population of single cell organisms come from? Did they evolve? Or were they created?"
Does not matter to the ToE.
Irrelevant.
They could have developed through physics and chemistry; They could have been Spoken into existence by the Divine; They could have been planted by little grey aliens.
IT DOES NOT MATTER.
Once they were there, subject to environmental stimuli and dependent upon environmental resources, evolution takes over.