I made no insinuation, and no accusation.
I made a fully repeatable set of observations of recorded behavior, developed four competing and one inclusive hypotheses, and asked you to select one of them or provide others.
as to your questions:
"Where did this large population of single cell organisms come from? Did they evolve? Or were they created?"
Does not matter to the ToE.
Irrelevant.
They could have developed through physics and chemistry; They could have been Spoken into existence by the Divine; They could have been planted by little grey aliens.
IT DOES NOT MATTER.
Once they were there, subject to environmental stimuli and dependent upon environmental resources, evolution takes over.
LOL. Sorry but your incosnistency is showing here.
If it is irrelevant where the single cell organisms came from then it is equally irrelevant where the dinosaurs came from or where dogs came from or where man came from. To quote you, "They could have developed through physics and chemistry; They could have been Spoken into existence by the Divine; They could have been planted by little grey aliens. IT DOES NOT MATTER.
And when it comes down to brass tacks, it really doesn't matter, does it? Science deals with what is. History deals with what was. In that sense Evolution is neither science nor history. It is a theory without a foundation. It is a building built from the sky down. It is, in fact, a religion.
The Science of genetics has nothing to do with the theory of evolution. How the genes got there is as irrelevant as how the single celled organisms got there. You don't know. And IT DOES NOT MATTER.