Considering the fact that at no point in this discussion have I addressed the origin of life itself, nor extolled the virtues of one or another theory of abiogenesis (you will kindly note NOW, as you seem to have failed to do the first time around, that in #110, the FIRST factor of the GIVEN is an EXTANT "large population of single cell organisms"), your replies and your admonishments that I "try again" are curious indeed.
I can think of a few possible explanations for your responses:
1. you gentlemen are unobservant
-or-
2. you gentlemen are so deeply steeped in an indoctrinated belief system that you literally cannot comprehend arguments which fall outside of your narrow creed. This is an intermediary between simple unobservance and...
-or-
3. you gentlemen are actually stupid
-or-
4. you gentlemen are engaging in deliberate mendacity.
-or-
5. All of the above.
Which is it? Or is there another possibility?
That being said, your theory was based upon unprovable assumptions. I pointed that out and you claim that I must be unobservant or stupid. I don't appreciate your insinuations or accusations.
Now would you like to take a stab at answering the questions? Or will you continue to dissemble?
Where did this large population of single cell organisms come from? Did they evolve? Or were they created?
If they must have evolved, then evolutionary theory is dependent upon abiogenesis. So you need to prove your theory from the ground up. You however are building your theory from the sky down. Hence, you have no foundation.
I will patiently await either your thoughtful response or your vile personal insult. It's your choice.