Skip to comments.
Disaster Can’t Destroy Gun Rights
NRA-ILA ^
| 9/12/05
| NRA-ILA
Posted on 09/12/2005 5:12:45 PM PDT by Nov3
Monday, September 12, 2005
National Rifle Association leader Wayne LaPierre slammed New Orleans authorities Monday for seizing legal firearms from lawful residents.
"What weve seen in Louisiana - the breakdown of law and order in the aftermath of disaster - is exactly the kind of situation where the Second Amendment was intended to allow citizens to protect themselves, " LaPierre said.
"When law enforcement isnt available, Americans turn to the one right that protects all the others - the right to keep and bear arms," LaPierre said. "This attempt to repeal the Second Amendment should be condemned."
The New York Times reported last Thursday that no civilians in New Orleans will be allowed to have guns, quoting the superintendent of police that "only law enforcement are allowed to have weapons."
A Louisiana state statute allows the chief law enforcement officer to "regulate possession" of firearms during declared emergencies. "But regulate doesnt mean confiscate," said Chris W. Cox, the NRAs chief lobbyist.
"Authorities are using that statute to do what the looters and criminals could not: disarm the law-abiding citizens of New Orleans trying to protect their homes and families," Cox said.
"The NRA will not stand idly by while guns are confiscated from law-abiding people whore trying to defend themselves," he said.
"Were exploring every legal option available to protect the rights of lawful people in New Orleans," Cox said, "and were taking steps to overturn such laws in every state where they exist."
"Local authorities in New Orleans are turning natures assault on human life into mans assault on human rights," LaPierre said. "Four million NRA members intend to stop this unconstitutional power grab."
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2cndamendment; banglist; jackboots; thugs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
To: longtermmemmory; Registered
Similarly after 9/11 everyone wore NYPD shirts with pride. NOBODY wants a NO PD t-shirt. There is an opportunity here!
41
posted on
09/12/2005 8:12:36 PM PDT
by
Nov3
("This is the best election night in history." --DNC chair Terry McAuliffe Nov. 2,2004 8p.m.)
To: planekT
He got all bent out of shape because I was on a thread about dogs being shot in St. Bernard Parish by the redneck BTK sherrif and said that the NOPD was in real trouble now. As long as they stuck to seizing guns and kicking old ladies @$$e$ everything was OK but they crossed a line with the post 2000 freepers when they started shooting dogs! It must have struck a nerve because it blew the thread up!
And notice when I was talking about the post 2000 freepers I said "as a general rule"! The rule must have applied judging from the reaction.
42
posted on
09/12/2005 8:17:59 PM PDT
by
Nov3
("This is the best election night in history." --DNC chair Terry McAuliffe Nov. 2,2004 8p.m.)
To: Nov3; longtermmemmory; Registered
"I left the NOPD an all I got was a trip to Vegas"
43
posted on
09/12/2005 8:20:57 PM PDT
by
planekT
(What a mess.)
To: planekT
and a Brand New soaking wet Plasma TV.
44
posted on
09/12/2005 8:26:39 PM PDT
by
Nov3
("This is the best election night in history." --DNC chair Terry McAuliffe Nov. 2,2004 8p.m.)
To: Nov3
Oh no doubt. Some FReepers prefer dogs to people. That pit bull that mauled the children to death only did that because he was mistreated.
Of course, that doesn't hold up when they attack their benevolent owners and chew their ass up.
45
posted on
09/12/2005 8:27:33 PM PDT
by
planekT
(What a mess.)
To: planekT
I love dogs and was sickened when I saw the BTK sherrif in his wife beater T-shirt getting his rocks off shooting people's pets. It disgusted me - but the real problem was the mandatory evac. The only people who are going to take care of the pets are the owners and they were having thier Rights trashed.
46
posted on
09/12/2005 8:41:05 PM PDT
by
Nov3
("This is the best election night in history." --DNC chair Terry McAuliffe Nov. 2,2004 8p.m.)
To: Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; Bernard; BJClinton; ...
![](http://www.triplettschool.org/pages/images/a_statlib.gif)
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
47
posted on
09/12/2005 8:44:11 PM PDT
by
freepatriot32
(Deep within every dilemma is a solution that involves explosives)
To: planekT; Nov3; longtermmemmory; Registered
"I (heart symbol) NOPD NYPD"
48
posted on
09/12/2005 8:50:41 PM PDT
by
tarheelswamprat
(This tagline space for rent - cheap!)
To: Nov3
I have no problems with dogs either. We have a nice faithful mutt. He barks when he should, and he hasn't bit anybody. He never has had a reason to, and he's just generally well tempered.
Dogs left unattended though will likely form packs. The meanest one in the bunch is who the rest will follow.
Many years back a neighbor of mine had a dog that just kind of went nuts for some reason. It threatened his mother. This dog had in previous weeks suddenly killed every cat they had. He couldn't do it himself, and asked me if I would shoot it. This same dog who had never given me any problem for years had by the way about two weeks before the incident with his mom acted like he was going to chew me up.
So, I didn't have a problem with getting rid of that POS.
That's my story and I'm sticking to it. I like dogs, but I expect them to behave. They are good animals, but still animals. If left to their own devices without assistance, they can become a danger.
Did you ever read White Fang by Jack London? Socialist that he was, he could really get inside of an animals skin. I still get chills recalling the chapter "The Clinging Death".
49
posted on
09/12/2005 9:14:56 PM PDT
by
planekT
(What a mess.)
To: Burf
What is the Administration's position on this?
I Believe the administration's policy is
50
posted on
09/12/2005 9:48:12 PM PDT
by
Celtman
(It's never right to do wrong to do right.)
To: Nov3
The guy that body slammed the old woman was a CHP as in California or Connecticut ....I head a strong Boston or NYC accent from someone in that fiasco ?
Stay safe !
51
posted on
09/12/2005 10:37:33 PM PDT
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
To: panaxanax; Nov3
I really feel that this disaster gave the feds the opportunity to test their power against lawful gun-owners.
THIS IS ONLY A TEST! Be prepared for gun confiscation coming to a town near you. Disasters could be a blizzard, tornados, blackouts, gas shortages etc, whatever FEMA and the Feds want it to be.
I'd rate it as being one ratchet-notch higher (on the scale of incremental loss of liberty) than a "test'.
I consider it to be an "exercise", and I don't think it's likely to be the only exercise of that sort.
Several years ago, there was something making the rounds that was at first dismissed as an urban legend, but then it was revealed to be an actual incident.
I'm referring to the 29 Palms "Combat Arms Survey".
It looks like that survey (and probably a lot of stuff that DIDN'T leak out) is coming to fruition.
To: JoeGar; Nov3
I want to watch the NOPD take the assault rifles away from the Blackwater Security guys and other mercenaries that have been hired to protect private property.
I want to see that, AND, I want to see people HERE stop DEFENDING that abomination, AND, I want to see them also stop getting all pissy about "they're NOT 'mercenaries'!"
They ARE mercs. They're a merc outfit. It's WHAT THEY DO.
If THEY'RE not mercs, then we might as well delete the word from the dictionary.
To: Nov3
O'Reilly can help you with the interpretation!
Tell him they were confiscating loofahs.
To: Tom Thumbs
The problem is that the wishy-washy hand-wringing left has redefined the term "mercenary" to mean "hired killer."
Mercenaries have only been considered across-the-board bad in recent times. Of course, American history has a lot of bad things to say about the Hessians in the Revolutionary War, but 18th century conflict typically had mercenaries on both sides. Indeed, issuing a letter of marque (which our Constitution explicity allows for) is issued to a person for the purpose of fighting an enemy in exchange for allowing the person to profit from it.
Until recent times, there were only two kinds of militaries. Impressed troops and volunteer troops. Paid, professional troops, like the ones that we have serving right now, and also including police forces, would have been considered mercenaries.
Just another one of those words and phrases that the left has hijacked.
55
posted on
09/13/2005 12:54:05 AM PDT
by
Knitebane
(Happily Microsoft free since 1999.)
To: longtermmemmory
no, there will be some shops that will sell a whole bunch of NOPD shirts..probably that say something like "support looting, support NOPD" pic of cops with shopping carts and TVs on back. or maybe "don't loot, NOPD hates competition" or maybe, "NOPD: in case of emergency, break glass" with a picture of plane tickets to vegas in a glass case.
and of course there's the one on cafepress that's being sold..
"I survived Hurricane Katrina to have my land grabbed by the New Orleans Police Department, and the Lousiana National Guard..."
http://www.cafepress.com/cp/browse/store/paxdesignh.30729651
56
posted on
09/13/2005 6:01:39 AM PDT
by
absolootezer0
("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
To: AAABEST; wku man; SLB; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; The Old Hoosier; xrp; freedomlover; ...
57
posted on
09/13/2005 6:39:33 AM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
To: Joe Brower
58
posted on
09/13/2005 6:50:43 AM PDT
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
To: panaxanax
Be prepared for gun confiscation coming to a town near you. That'd be a really bad move for them. Even here in Austin, TX.
59
posted on
09/13/2005 6:51:32 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(Anyone who needs to be persuaded to be free, doesn't deserve to be. -El Neil)
To: Squantos
60
posted on
09/13/2005 6:52:27 AM PDT
by
unixfox
(AMERICA - 20 Million ILLEGALS Can't Be Wrong!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson