Posted on 09/10/2005 4:51:51 AM PDT by Perdogg
A Defense Department employee will testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Sept. 21 that civilian superiors in 2000 ordered him to destroy a huge cache of data from a classified program that tracked al Qaeda, a congressman said Thursday.
"Another witness will testify that he was ordered to destroy 2.5 terabytes of data related to Able Danger and al Qaeda," said Rep. Curt Weldon, R-Pa., referring to a now widely publicized "data-mining" program that gathered information about people from a host of sources to establish links and patterns that would not otherwise come to light. The amount of data obliterated is equivalent to 125,000 trees made into paper and printed, or a quarter of the print volumes in the Library of Congress.
"He was ordered to destroy the data or he would lose his job or go to jail," Weldon said of the Defense official, whom he did not name. "What were their motives? I think we have to find out."
News of the coming testimony about the destruction of Able Danger data is the latest development about the controversial and once-classified program. Five people who were connected to Able Danger said the program identified Mohammed Atta, the ringleader of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, as a potential threat more than a year earlier. Weldon and some of these people also said the Defense Department did not share with the FBI what it learned about al Qaeda as a result of Able Danger prior to the attacks.
"We have identified the FBI employees in the Washington field office who arranged three meetings [with Able Danger personnel] that were canceled," Weldon said.
"It was a very serious breach not to pass that information on and to have it shared," said Senate Judiciary Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., in an Aug. 31 statement about the Pentagon's withholding of Able Danger information from the FBI. "The consequences of not identifying them was that 9-11 might have been avoided."
Because the destruction of Able Danger data occurred prior to both Sept. 11 and the 2005 disclosure of Able Danger's existence, no one suggests the data was eradicated to cover up what the Pentagon knew about al Qaeda. But senior members of Congress from both parties are determined to learn why the Pentagon would destroy a massive trove of information about terrorism when it was even then a critical concern of U.S. national security agencies.
Destroyed Data Pentagon officials acknowledged at a Sept. 2 briefing that they destroyed the data. They said it was done as a matter of routine to protect the identity of "U.S. persons" citizens and those who were visiting the country legally.
But Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer, an Army intelligence officer who worked on the program, said Thursday that before the Able Danger data was destroyed, he had briefed senior officials in the Pentagon and White House on ways to excise U.S. persons' names without losing the entire database. He said the Pentagon must have obliterated the data for another reason that it is not disclosing.
BTTT
Maybe in coming weeks, the Katrina mess will move a little further toward the back of the stove and this situation will gain the attention that it deserves.
I just turned to stone.
The face that launched Sandy Burglar.
Gore Lick
bttt
Isn't his sentencing coming up soon?
BTTT
Can some insightful Freeper please hypothesize about what was really going on here?
I know they upped his fine from 10K to 50K, but I don't know if that's the end of it.
As one 'old fart' to another, I wish I shared your optimism.
save
Notice that they weren't citizens but "persons."
The Clinton swine were protecting the terrorists.
Bump
The Clinton swine wanted "no mention of trouble with terrorists" Ignore it and let's look good. Well, thank you, that is not the job description of
American president!
There has been some speculation in the blogosphere that the data miners were TOO good at their work, meaning that in addition to finding links between Islamic terrorists and US citizens, that they also found links between US politicians and foreign nationals, and that those links involved major $ transfers. [Remember Sen. Fred Thompson's trying to connect dots between Clinton campaign fund donations and what appeared to be big foreign spenders w/links to Chinese intelligence services? The mysterious transfer of Loral space technology to China (a major Dem. donor was involved), and China's interest in acquiring control of both the Panama Canal and facilities in the port of Long Beach? This is the kind of stuff that data mining is intended to look at...]
Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.