Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
Before you make any statement about "winning" the war, you must first tell me: 1) what our objective was, and 2) how we accomplished it.

Our objective was to prevent the North Vietnamese from taking over the South. We had it won by making them militarily incapable of doing so. The Viet Cong was useless, the NVA was defeated every time they came out, and Giap would later say that if it weren't for the rebirth of the antiwar movement in Kerry's era, they would have stopped trying to take the South.

Vietnamization was proceeding well, and we were on track to have a relationship with the South like the one we already had with the ROK--You guys are your own show, but we're ready to provide massive combat power to defend you if your criminal neighbor invades. But then something happened...and that something is the answer to the question in my last post to you. So answer that and get back to me.

255 posted on 09/09/2005 5:10:33 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback ("It's diabolical...It's lemon scented...this plan can't POSSIBLY fail!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Silverback
Giap also said that the NVA was prepared to fight a 35-year war against the U.S. If you think the U.S. could ever have mustered the political support for a 35-year war, you're dreaming.

Just think about that for a moment, and imagine what it would be like for the U.S. to be involved in major combat operations from 1965 through 2000 -- which would have included the administrations of seven U.S. presidents.

339 posted on 09/09/2005 9:05:41 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson