If you are ordered to leave your home and refuse to leave it, you then become an unlawful citizen. Unlawful citizens can be legally disarmed. ***There is always a way to get around any freedom we have a right to enjoy. At least for a little while until it is challenged in a court of law. Which, in this case, will be to late to do anything about it.
It is not a crimne to be bothering no one, self sustaining on your own proprty and potectingsaid property.
They are asking for trouble in doing this and there will is a greater chance for additional bloodshed where none is required. In fact, those citizens are a boon to local governments and law enforcement. Because of their good citizenship and preparation, they are apt to be an anchor in their neighborhood to disuade looters and criminals, thus allowing more resource to be applied to where it is really needed.
By doing this, the government (as is particularly the case with leftists, librals, and RINOs) has gotten things bass-ackward as they normally do and is creating a problem where none exists and is in fact taking a good thing and ruining it.
As I said. I do not believe it is "legal" because it is in abject violation of the constitution of both the state as I understand it, and the nation. It should not be tolerated.
Bull Run was "according to Lincoln's interpretation" of his own unConstitutional police powers attacking a foreign army of men of the Confederacy protecting their homes. The Brit's march around Concord was lawful only according to the Brits.
Our goverments' recent serial/mass murder at Ruby Ridge and Waco is legal precedence to protect murdering federals from exposure to justice, as is Civil War to defend Americans' ratifed Constitution where we don'depend on political blackrobes to tell us that our Constitution does not mean what it clearly says, but rather means what it does not say.
Lawful? Where in our RATIFIED Constitution is the nullification clause of our Bill of Rights and other such inconveniences as it may suit some officious order by someone purportedly in (THE) authority?
As through all time, Police Powers of the State shall reign suprem - lawful or not, until the tyrants are removed by the violent consent of the governed.
These are dangerous times amid profound abuses of authority at all levels. It is obvious that those people do so at their own risk. As I see these 'Disarm and abandon your homestead, maybe you're outnumbered, hopefully outgunned.' confrontations, "LE" faces a real shotout risk if they persist in such unlawful acts under color of law not in compliance to our RATIFIED Constitution.
I only state the obvious in the light that uniformed N.O. cops looted. Uniforms were stripped off and abandoned in the street as N.O. cops went AWOL. Who says some of these "LE" teams are not looters?