Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ElkGroveDan
The Ca. senate voted for this and this is what their constituents want?

Do you know how Texas would react if legislation was even proposed!

7 posted on 09/08/2005 3:15:14 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TexasCajun

Someone proposes it every legislative session in TX. It never goes anywhere, and 2/3rds of the time that person isn't in office after the next electoral cycle.


11 posted on 09/08/2005 3:29:33 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: TexasCajun
It isn't something we want in California. It's been vetoed three times by Gray Davis, signed once, killed once by Arnold and here it is *AGAIN*. We have this legislature nicknamed "one bill Gil" who seems to only push one piece of legislation. Year after year. After year.

60%+ of CA voters decided marriage was only between one man and one women and yet this same legislature just passed "gay marriage."

We don't *have* a representative gov't. In fact, if Bush wants to bring democracy anywhere else, he should invade California at dawn. Arnold has a series of reforms on a special election ballot. One of them would force redistricting that would break the monopoly of incumbency and undermine the sweetheart deal between the GOP and Dems to ensure districts are never in play.

We're fighting back, but I wouldn't dare try to handicap the battle.

60 posted on 09/09/2005 1:19:26 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Cindy Sheehan: "All You Are Saying Is Give APPEASEMENT A Chance!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson