To: highlymotivated
No. Nail him for premeditated murder in the 1st degree.
12 posted on
09/06/2005 7:55:44 AM PDT by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
To: RadioAstronomer
No. Nail him for premeditated murder in the 1st degree. I will only add the crime of impersonating a Federal Officer as well.
36 posted on
09/06/2005 8:05:31 AM PDT by
TheOtherOne
(I often sacrifice my spelling on the alter of speed™)
To: RadioAstronomer
No. Nail him for premeditated murder in the 1st degree. Right. If he is willing to do the crime, he should be willing to do the time.
39 posted on
09/06/2005 8:06:19 AM PDT by
gridlock
(IF YOU'RE NOT CATCHING FLAK, YOU'RE NOT OVER THE TARGET...)
To: RadioAstronomer
Exactly. They've already paid for their crimes, and while they "might" reoffend, they might not either. It was not up to this guy to make that judgement.
We are a nation of laws, people; you may not like the rules but you cannot take it upon yourself to break them. If you want rule changes, vote for the folks who'll change them.
45 posted on
09/06/2005 8:07:36 AM PDT by
Junior
(Just because the voices in your head tell you to do things doesn't mean you have to listen to them)
To: RadioAstronomer
Vigilantism is no replacement for life sentences without the possibility of parole.
131 posted on
09/06/2005 8:57:58 AM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
("Avoid novelties, for every novelty is an innovation, and every innovation is an error. " - Mohammed)
To: RadioAstronomer
No. Nail him for premeditated murder in the 1st degree. As much as emotion can make one want to excuse this man's actions, we can not.
You are the only one, so far, that has any common sense.
He must be prosecuted. To allow this is to allow a continuance of the lawlessness that went on in New Orleans.
The law is the law, and no man has a right to murder another.
Note: Murder is different than kill.
To: RadioAstronomer
210 posted on
09/06/2005 10:25:37 AM PDT by
r9etb
To: RadioAstronomer
Nail him for premeditated murder in the 1st degree. As much as the visceral reaction is to give hime the keys to the city, we can't descend into vigilantiism.
We are a nation of laws. What if there was a mistake or a spelling error on the web site? A 100% innocent man could be dead because someone decided to short cut the process we all, as Americans, agree to follow.
265 posted on
09/06/2005 1:29:13 PM PDT by
Shazbot29
(muhammed was the most evil person ever to live. May he burn in hell forever)
To: RadioAstronomer
>> No. Nail him for premeditated murder in the 1st degree.
First rational response.
I would give him consideration for a mental defect, possibly.
296 posted on
09/06/2005 5:19:48 PM PDT by
mmercier
(a long acquaintance with sorrow)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson