Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Soul Seeker
Predicated only on the belief Roberts is not a strict constitutionalist.

He is no Rehnquist, Scalia, or Thomas, that's for sure.

316 posted on 09/05/2005 8:10:29 AM PDT by GoBucks2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]


To: GoBucks2002

You guys are flat out wrong! Maybe you shouldn't believe what the media has to say. You are all going to have egg on your faces when the facts come out with your comments.


320 posted on 09/05/2005 8:13:46 AM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Allen in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies ]

To: GoBucks2002

No, because there is only one Scalia, one Rehnquist and one Thomas. God is funny that way in prefering originals in his creation.

But I assume you mean ideologically? even there you are off center. None of those Justices see or saw eye to eye in every instance. Further, even the leader of the "opposition", Coulter, states she doesn't know so I find it interesting you are willing to go out on a further limb then even she has climbed in your certainty.


331 posted on 09/05/2005 8:22:33 AM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson