Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Knitting A Conundrum
It's her state. She has to do a bunch of things for things to happen.

Okay. I appreciate that. So one person -- obviously with no ability to control the response to a manjor, national catastrophe -- is going to cause thousands to die from lack of food and water in the street and the federal government is going to stand by and watch it happen?

3,007 posted on 09/02/2005 5:32:38 AM PDT by Types_with_Fist (I'm on FReep so often that when I read an article at another site I scroll down for the comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2995 | View Replies ]


To: Types_with_Fist

If you are going to act within the constitution, the Feds can't override a governor just because they are being a jerk.

Or at least not simply. With Bush, with the mythology about him from the left, it would be a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation.

I don't know how he could do it without provoking a constitutional crisis.


3,016 posted on 09/02/2005 5:38:12 AM PDT by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3007 | View Replies ]

To: Types_with_Fist

It literally has to. It literally takes an act of Congress to do otherwise.

Read the Posse Commitatus law. It's inconvenient - but it has teeth.


3,160 posted on 09/02/2005 6:21:23 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3007 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson