To: Keith in Iowa
Should the tax payer be on the Hook when San Fransisco falls apart after the next big quake hits???
15 posted on
08/30/2005 4:07:34 PM PDT by
fhlh
(.)
To: fhlh
Or for the farmers, no matter what the weather is.
To: fhlh
>>>Should the tax payer be on the Hook when San Fransisco falls apart after the next big quake hits???
Good question. Part of me thinks not. People who choose to live in places like that should be willing to take the responsibility for their choices...and not expect to spread their risk on society.
19 posted on
08/30/2005 4:10:52 PM PDT by
Keith in Iowa
(Liberals...they're so quixotic...)
To: fhlh
Should the tax payer be on the Hook when San Fransisco falls apart after the next big quake hits???Not for a dime.
Those people know they are on a major fault. They know that a 'big one' has hit before. They know another 'big one' is inevitable. It's not a random happenstance. The disaster will be massive & they KNOW it is coming, yet choose to stay.
You pay if you stay. Not the rest of the world.
54 posted on
08/30/2005 4:41:09 PM PDT by
Lester Moore
(islam's allah is Satan and is NOT the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.)
To: fhlh
Should the tax payer be on the Hook when San Fransisco falls apart after the next big quake hits??? No. No one is making anyone live in San Francisco.
65 posted on
08/30/2005 4:48:23 PM PDT by
tortoise
(All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
To: fhlh
Should the tax payer be on the Hook when San Fransisco falls apart after the next big quake hits???
I dont think so.
134 posted on
08/30/2005 6:15:21 PM PDT by
Chickensoup
(Mmmmmmm! Mmmmmmm! Good!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson