Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: exnavychick
we don't have to have written permission from the Founders to do the right thing, or the smart thing.

That's fine. For all I know yours is the smart, correct position to take. I think it's noteworthy that on THE conservative forum, the Constitution is clearly a matter of convenience. The only debate would be under what circumstances to shelve it. If that's you believe, it appears the overwhelming majority of conservatives agree with you. So there it is. The Constitution is optional. If you believe that is the right way to go, as you say it is, then you shouldn't object to me pointing it out.

458 posted on 08/30/2005 12:03:23 PM PDT by Huck (" 'Neo-Con' is like an old headline. Nobody will know what it means in 10 years."--Keith Richards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies ]


To: Huck

Well, that's what we have Amendments for. Where would you come down on the idea of an Amendment to the Constitution that would EXPRESSLY permit such action by the federal government?

Surely you would be okay with that, since Amendments are the perfect way to address your concerns about all this "extraconstitutional activity". Then you would have an updated version of the political Emily Post to reference in case of the next natural disaster.


465 posted on 08/30/2005 12:07:28 PM PDT by exnavychick (We're damned if we do, damned if we don't...so my vote goes for "do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson