Skip to comments.
U.S. Mint Confiscates 10 Rare Gold Coins
Yahoo | AP ^
| 8/25/05
Posted on 08/25/2005 9:52:28 AM PDT by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 201-210 next last
To: AntiGuv
If I'm willing to pay you $1 million for your ounce of gold, then its value is $1 million - and that's neither mythical nor magical... Don't go introducing economic truth into an emotional argument.
To: LexBaird
Yes, it was a theft . . . by this woman's father and some Mint employee in the '30s. And the Mint did get their (our) property back from the thieves who stole it. Conjecture. No evidence whatsoever that that is the case. The government employees stole this woman's property. Period.
102
posted on
08/25/2005 11:13:43 AM PDT
by
Skooz
("Political Correctness is the handmaiden of terrorism" - Michelle Malkin)
To: LibWhacker
LOL! I'm sure the poor fool didn't ralize what he was doing, but it still should stand as an object lesson in possessing gold. There are, unfortunately, people out there who will obey the government when it uses its self-declared authority to confiscate precious metals:
Turning in their gold.
To: Ken H
Shouldn't the government have to prove in a court of law that the coins were obtained illegally?Thus, that post of mine began with a big, bold "if".
Due process of law, comin' right up.
104
posted on
08/25/2005 11:16:41 AM PDT
by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
To: Dead Corpse
Quite frankly if I were to come into possession of one of these coins I would make a quality impression of it and from that make my own stamp. I would then turn in the coin, publically so they would have to destroy it, and take my stamp offshore and start making "authentic reproductions" of the Double Eagle. Sure, it would sell for a lot less but it would still mint you a fortune.
105
posted on
08/25/2005 11:17:01 AM PDT
by
TigersEye
(BBQ is the answer.)
To: newgeezer; 1rudeboy
You both definitely have a point that the coins were stolen property and taking it back is what the government does with stolen property. I still think the disparity between King Farouk's (or whoever's) coin and these coins is unfair.
I guess the thing that really kicks me in the gut is that they handed them over to the Mint or announced even that they had them. I wonder, because they couldn't be so ignorant of what these coins represented, if maybe they've got 20 more back at the jewelry store.
106
posted on
08/25/2005 11:18:30 AM PDT
by
SittinYonder
(Nemo me impune lacessit)
To: LibWhacker
all ur stuff r belong to us
107
posted on
08/25/2005 11:21:58 AM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(Save the whales. Redeem them for valuable prizes.)
To: ArtyFO
"The value of gold is a myth."
So's the value of the dollar. Would you rather have a $20 bill or a $20 gold piece?
To: mzbzybee
I would have obtained the services of an attorney first.They did. Didn't help. FedGov does what it wants to do.
109
posted on
08/25/2005 11:22:49 AM PDT
by
zeugma
(Muslims are varelse...)
To: Bogey78O
'After a legal battle, the dealer was permitted to sell the coin at auction on the condition he split the proceeds with the Mint.'
This jumped out at me right away, Bogey! Un-freakin'-believable! The Mint gets a cut just because???? No way!
BTW -- what is the government going to do with their windfall??? Reduce the debt??? Doubt it!!!
110
posted on
08/25/2005 11:24:20 AM PDT
by
Polyxene
(For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
To: ArtyFO
Free Republic is FREE to those who don't pay for it... but yet THEY get worth out of it, yes???
111
posted on
08/25/2005 11:25:32 AM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: LibWhacker
112
posted on
08/25/2005 11:33:45 AM PDT
by
houeto
(Mr. President, close our borders now!)
To: ArtyFO
The value of gold is a myth. If that's really true, then why did our government order almost all of it to be confiscated?
113
posted on
08/25/2005 11:35:55 AM PDT
by
jpl
To: Jack Black
"Owning full auto machine guns is illegal. ..."
"someone is sure to point out all you need is a Class III license, residence in a state that permits it, a $500 per gun license, etc. OK, granted."
Actually, you don't need any form of license. All it takes is permission from the local top cop and the payment of a 200 dollar tax.
114
posted on
08/25/2005 11:36:12 AM PDT
by
VRing
To: Jack Black
Huh? $440 an oz. That's not mythical it's pretty real. The intrinsic cost of producing an ounce of gold is ~$175 and falling rapidly (new production is around $125 per oz). One could argue that the spot price, which tends to reflect cartel pricing unless the central banks are dumping stock, does not reflect its true and reasonable value.
115
posted on
08/25/2005 11:38:34 AM PDT
by
tortoise
(All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
To: AntiGuv
No problem. If you are offering me $1 million for an ounce of gold, let me know when and where and I will have it...
116
posted on
08/25/2005 11:41:39 AM PDT
by
nickcarraway
(I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
To: Dead Corpse
Supposedly... but the burden of proof is on the Government here. They've already admitted that they can't prove it.I think that's the point. THey can't prove that the coins were stolen. There was a three or four day window when they could have been legally purchased. I think that given as much time has passed the burden of proof on FedGov should be fairly high. Problem is, FedGov has lots of guns and has demonstrated time and time again that they are more than willing to use them.
117
posted on
08/25/2005 11:42:46 AM PDT
by
zeugma
(Muslims are varelse...)
To: Skooz
Not conjecture. No 1933 gold coins were publically issued. Some were stolen and sold on the black market. This woman's dad admitted to selling some of the stolen coins in 1944. Now more show up, passed down from the admitted fence. Q.E.D.
They are either stolen from the Mint or are counterfeit currency, either of which case deserves confiscation. If the latter, she deserves arrest as well.
118
posted on
08/25/2005 11:47:07 AM PDT
by
LexBaird
(tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
To: LibWhacker
Switt admitted in 1944 that he had sold nine Double Eagle coins,
but he was not charged in connection with those transactions, according to the Mint.
Fool me once...
119
posted on
08/25/2005 11:49:03 AM PDT
by
evets
(God bless president Bush!)
To: LexBaird
You got me.
It doesn't happen often.
Relish this victory. :0)
120
posted on
08/25/2005 11:50:45 AM PDT
by
Skooz
("Political Correctness is the handmaiden of terrorism" - Michelle Malkin)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 201-210 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson