[Quick1]

Again, bad jokes are no substitute for good arguments.

As I see you wouldn't recognize brilliant satire if it came up and slapped you in the face, here's the only argument I need: ID is NOT science. It has no testable, falsifiable hypothesis, and should not be taught in science class, where we need our kids to learn about, you know, SCIENCE, and the scientific method.

Show me the hypothesis for ID that is testable and falsifiable, and I will be first in line to say that it should be taught in science class.

[wideawake]

As I see you wouldn't recognize brilliant satire if it came up and slapped you in the face

You have an extremely low threshhold for what you consider "brilliance", apparently.

Show me the hypothesis for ID that is testable and falsifiable

Quite simple. ID hypothesizes that an irreducibly complex organ is not replicable through a random process of natural selection. Create such an organ in an organism which did not previously possess it in a lab through a randomized process and voila! You have tested ID and found that it can be falsified.