[curiosity]

I would quibble with your comments on point one in the sense that every time IC item "1" can be demonstrated to have evolved, the IDers come back with IC item "2." And so on ad infinitum.

Behe made the bold claim that it is impossible for any IC process/system/organ/organalle to evolve in a Darwinian fashion. This claim has been falsified.

Everytime something IC has been shown to be evolvable he either, a) ignores it b) claims it's not really IC c)demands every last detail of its evolution be described or d)ignores it.

[Ichneumon]

Everytime something IC has been shown to be evolvable he either, a) ignores it b) claims it's not really IC c)demands every last detail of its evolution be described or d)ignores it.

In other words, he follows the traditional creationist playbook. I note that wideawake seems to be using approach "A" in response to your well-written post on why "IC" has fallen and it can't get up.

[Gumlegs]

Agreed. Telling points, all.