[Diamond]

...that falls under the realm of science.

I was challenging your definition of science, and asking for empirical proof of it, not the proposition that divine intervention is not a possibility.

Cordially,

[Antonello]

I was challenging your definition of science, and asking for empirical proof of it, not the proposition that divine intervention is not a possibility.

I am a mere lay person in regards to science, but I accept as a definition in this case to be the established scientific process. I may be rusty on it, but I believe that would mean for something to fall under 'the realm of science' it would need to begin as a testable hypothesis. Now if you are also asking me to provide empirical proof that this is how science works, then I fear I am not the right guy for the job. As I said, I'm just a lay person here.