To: Vaquero
there are no competing theories where facts are concerned....
Phrenology=Fact
plain and simple.....pray all you want it wont change
blah blah blah blah blah
Were evolution fact, as gravity is fact, there wouldn't be any debate.
Evolution is an interpretation of certain facts, and a disputed interpretation at that.
Assert your interpretation all you want - it's still your interpretation.
15 posted on
08/24/2005 7:09:59 AM PDT by
wideawake
(God bless our brave troops and their Commander in Chief)
To: wideawake
Were evolution fact, as gravity is fact, there wouldn't be any debate.
Fact: Two bodies of mass have some kind of force that pull each other together. However, we don't know what exactly this force is, gravitrons, gravity waves, or even some kind of string. The Theory of Gravity can never be proven. Maybe you should check your facts.
18 posted on
08/24/2005 7:14:06 AM PDT by
Quick1
To: wideawake
It is there in the fossil record...pick it up an look at it....and please don't hide behind conservatism.....there are more than enough of us men of science behind that rock with you...it is not your exclusive bailiwick and you give it a bad name.
26 posted on
08/24/2005 7:22:10 AM PDT by
Vaquero
(lets all play " The Crusades")
To: wideawake
Were evolution fact, as gravity is fact, there wouldn't be any debate.
Have you ever seen a graviton?
Didn't think so. If evolution is shaky, then gravity is a half-assed hypothesis.
To: wideawake
64 posted on
08/24/2005 8:03:49 AM PDT by
weegee
(The Rovebaiting by DUAC must stop. It is nothing but a partisan witchhunt.)
To: wideawake
Phrenology=Fact Have you considered Corrective Phrenology?
82 posted on
08/24/2005 8:19:49 AM PDT by
steve-b
(A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson