Replies

But as National Security Advisor, it's likely he would hve known about it.

Exactly. I believe the poster is hinting that Sandy Burglar may have been stealing documents that could implicate the Clinton administration concerning Able Danger and the administration ignoring the threat. At least, that is the assumption.

One reason he could have done so is that he would have known about it, but other officials (perhaps including the Archives) wouldn't have.

There have been a lot of theories about a link between Sandy's burglary and Able Danger, some more outlandish than others. I'm just trying to get the facts out in the open.

For example, some FReepers have suggested that Sandy went burgling because he was tipped off that the 9/11 Commission was investigating Able Danger. The time line doesn't support that. Sandy burgled before the commission met with Lt. Col. Shaffer.

On the other hand, depending on when in "early 2000" the stolen millennium after action report was drafted, mentions of Able Danger's Atta-al Qaeda link could have been included in the stolen drafts of the report but not the others. I think this is doubtful, but possible.

In any event, we have no solid proof of any Berger-Able Danger link thus far.