Intuitively, I agree with you.
The issue is, Science class?
No.
A leap of faith is required to conclude "designer".
No leaps of faith for scientific theory.
And, if existance were not complex at all, if we were all gabby little water vapors, would we not still have the same
confounding questions?
Faith and science don't mix.
It would be even more puzzling - how did the water vapors get so gabby?
And the more we learn about the spectacular intricacy and complexity of life, the more "faith" it requires to believe that evolution explains it.
When Darwin roamed the Earth, we had very little understanding of the complexity of living things, nor of the Universe. Evolution was a plausible explanation.
That dog won't hunt any more. It is utterly impossible for Evolution to be the mechanism responsible for countless living structures. On the other hand, Intelligent Design literally fills our little corner of the universe. Intelligent Design exists in an great abundance and variety. It is foolish to not at least CONSIDER that it may in fact be the driving force of the Universe.