"adherent to the secular fundamentalist religious belief of evolution,..."
You throw this
1) as an insult?
2) to create an equivalency between ID, as faith, and evolutioin as faith.
This is common from the evangelical "ID be science" crowd.
You degrade your faith,religion and fundamentalism and science all in one ill considered statement.
It is your faith that is in crisis.
If the existance of a 90 million year old fossil threatens the existance of God in your mind, you have some work to do.
The conclusion of ID is based on a leap of faith.
Science can be faith to a materialist.
ID can only be faith to science.
This is not a debate over the existance of God.
It is a debate over the continued existance of science.
This is not a debate over the existance of God.
It is a debate over the continued existance of science.