Replies

This is not a debate over the existance of God.
It is a debate over the continued existance of science.

I'm truly puzzled now. I have often heard that evolutionists have tried to call evolution "science" but I have never quite had anyone say that science itself IS evolution. In other words, evolution is the highest order and if evolution falls, then science also falls?

How can challenging the validity of evolution be the end of science? Now I'm TRULY puzzled by these wierd types of circular logic...

ANTI-DNC Web Portal at ---> http://www.noDNC.com

"How can challenging the validity of evolution be the end of science?"

You are challenging science with a leap of faith, with a proposition that is supernatural, untestable, unverifiable.

You are free to criticise TOE. You are free to not believe it. But within science, you must adhere to the rules of science. If the fundamental aspects of the scientific method are abandoned, to a leap of faith, science and Reason itself is in fact undermined.

Would you be against teaching ID in another class?
Do you insist ID is science?

Calling the combined scientific community at Harvard University idiots is an absolute Troll Classic, BTW.

I am sure you will be cut and pasted all over the leftist blogosphere to demonstrate how really stupid freepers are.

Well done.

I still think Mr Robinson should have vaporized your a$$.

He didn't claim that evolution was science. He's claiming that in order for you to legislate that intelligent design is right, and evolution is wrong, and ignore any scientific evidence, and that ID is science, then the word of science holds no weight.