Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Could be that dad is not real father, report shows (Is that kid really yours?)
reuters via Yahoo News ^ | Aug 11, 2005 | SOURCE: Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, August 2005.

Posted on 08/11/2005 12:40:55 PM PDT by summer

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Perhaps one out of every 25 dads could unknowingly be raising another man's child, a finding that has huge health and social implications, according to report released Wednesday.

Exposing so-called paternal discrepancy -- when a child is identified as being biologically fathered by someone other than the man who believes he is the father -- could lead to family violence and the breakup of many families. On the other hand, leaving paternal discrepancy hidden means having the wrong genetic information, which could have health consequences.

A UK-based research team reviewed scientific research dealing with paternity published between 1950 and 2004 and reports that rates of paternal discrepancy range from less than 1 percent to as much as 30 percent.

The investigation also showed that becoming pregnant at a younger age, low socioeconomic status, and being in a long-term relationship rather than being married seem to be linked to greater likelihood of paternal discrepancy.

It is generally believed that rates of paternal discrepancy are less than 10 percent. A paternal discrepancy rate of 4 percent means that one in 25 families could be affected.

However, soaring rates of paternity testing in North America and Europe means more cases of paternal discrepancy will be identified in the years ahead, Professor Mark A. Bellis, from the Center for Public Health at the Liverpool John Moores University, and colleagues point out in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

In the United States, for example, rates of paternity testing more than doubled between 1991 and 2001. The increasing use of genetic testing for diagnosis and treatment of disease as well as in judicial procedures will also yield more opportunities to uncover cases where a father, unbeknownst to him, is not the biological parent.

"Modern genetic techniques continue to open a Pandora's box on hitherto hidden aspects of human sexual behavior," the investigators write.

Exposing such situations will inevitably affect not only deceived dads but also their family and potentially the biological father. Leaving paternal discrepancy undiagnosed, on the other hand, leaves those affected with incorrect genetic information that could prove harmful.

What's urgently needed, the authors say, is guidance on how and when paternal discrepancy should be exposed.

At present, most cases that are inadvertently identified are ignored by whoever uncovers the situation.

"However, in a society where services and life decisions are increasingly influenced by genetics, our approach to paternal discrepancy cannot be simply to ignore this difficult issue but must be informed by what best protects the health of those affected," Bellis and colleagues argue.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: dads; families; genes; kids; oops; paternity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-190 next last
To: devane617
Considering less that 22% of people ever leave thier hometowns

Is this a verifiable number? I am amazed.

161 posted on 08/14/2005 12:35:29 PM PDT by SandwicheGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Fishrrman; All
This morning I heard a radio commercial for an at-home DNA test, the first time I have ever heard such a commercial:

DNA Testing - 1 800 DNA TEST
DNA testing - 1 800 DNA TEST. We offer a free At-Home Paternity Test Kit, plus other types of DNA testing available for paternity, family, security and ... www.1800dnatest.com/ - 25k - Aug 12, 2005 - Cached - Similar pages

162 posted on 08/14/2005 12:37:36 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; RadioAstronomer
One can be an "evolutionist" and a Christian

And I am one of them.

Thank you.

163 posted on 08/14/2005 1:55:54 PM PDT by 2ndreconmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: summer

Gene Simmons of KISS says he slept with 4,600 women.

Wilt Chamberlain said he slept with more than 20000 women.

Who's your daddy? take your pick! lol


164 posted on 08/14/2005 2:00:02 PM PDT by TheForceOfOne (The alternative media is our Enigma machine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer
What's really screwed up is that as the laws now stand in most states, the man who has raised a child in this situation would proably be required by law to still support his wife's bastard.

Isn't that special?
165 posted on 08/14/2005 2:07:16 PM PDT by porkchops 4 mahound ("Liberalism IS a mental DISEASE!", TRUTH is the cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Many consider it more akin to an affliction.


166 posted on 08/14/2005 2:10:20 PM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0

If his name is on the birth certificate he may have to pay child support until ths child is 18, no matter wh9o the father is.


167 posted on 08/14/2005 2:20:10 PM PDT by nickcarraway (I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: seemoAR; Puddleglum
That is almost as bad as what cow birds do. The cow bird lays its eggs in another birds nest. The cow birds chick hatches first and and is raised by the other birds. The cow bird chicks push the other chicks out of the nest when they are hatched.

Cuckoos do the same thing, and thus the origin of the word "cuckold", meaning (noun): "the husband of an unfaithful wife" or (verb): "to make a cuckold of (a husband)".


168 posted on 08/14/2005 2:26:34 PM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

If you got the same hairdo as her, think of all the money you could save on film...


169 posted on 08/14/2005 2:26:55 PM PDT by nickcarraway (I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Terabitten

"Takes two to tango, me bucko."

Unfortunately, the husband and love child are left with shattered lives. It may take two to tango, but whores still don’t make good mothers or spouses.


170 posted on 08/14/2005 2:34:16 PM PDT by JeffersonRepublic.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SandwicheGuy
>>Considering less that 22% of people ever leave thier hometowns Is this a verifiable number? I am amazed.<<

I believe the stat is measured in miles. Most people live and die within 25 miles of their birthplace. I will check the census bureau for the exact stat.

171 posted on 08/14/2005 3:32:19 PM PDT by devane617
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

I wonder how many Cuckolds are reading these messages. :o(


172 posted on 08/14/2005 4:18:49 PM PDT by seemoAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Thank you so much for sharing your testimony, my friend!

The 6,000 years from Adam to now v the age of the universe is not a problem to me due to relativity and the inflationary model. Six days from the inception space/time coordinates are roughly equal to 15 billion years from our space/time coordinates.

There is no conflict when I consider Genesis 1-3 applies to the creation of both heaven and earth and describes events in both (as in Colossians 1:15-20) - that Adam's calendar doesn't begin until he is exiled to mortality in Genesis 4. The "clue" is that the tree of life is in the center of the Garden of Eden (Gen 2) and in the center of Paradise (Rev 2), i.e. spiritual or heavenly.

Seems like doctrines which insist that Adam was the first mortal man will always have a problem with science unless they assert that God created an old-looking universe, 6000 years ago.

173 posted on 08/14/2005 9:09:03 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

Comment #174 Removed by Moderator

To: summer

I worked in a Labor and Delivery unit when my kids were born. The lab was right across the hallway. I had DNA tests done on both of my girls. My ex was a whore. I worked long hours. I wanted to know that when it came time for child support that I was paying for MY kids.



I was. They are mine. Mom's still a whore.


175 posted on 08/30/2005 11:00:22 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (Warning: Exposure to the SON may PREVENT burning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devane617

"Out of wedlock birth rate from the African American community?"


Over 70%.


176 posted on 08/30/2005 11:01:38 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (Warning: Exposure to the SON may PREVENT burning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cjshapi

What does this say about the mothers?


177 posted on 08/30/2005 11:04:44 AM PDT by Junior (Just because the voices in your head tell you to do things doesn't mean you have to listen to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Ruckus of Dogs

"Bill Cosby made some no-so-funny remarks....."




I dunno, I thought they were hilarious.


178 posted on 08/30/2005 11:09:23 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (Warning: Exposure to the SON may PREVENT burning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: A Ruckus of Dogs

BUSH'S FAULT!!! Bush's fault!!!sarc/off


179 posted on 08/30/2005 11:10:55 AM PDT by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
"The father is the mother's husband. That has been the law for centuries and still is and should be. "


OK, but then was this fair?

I married a girl, she was PG, child is born, I'm sent to Nam, Real father moves in right after I've gone, I send all the $ back to the world, I come home, "Not" in a body-bag to find a man in bed with my wife(2:30 AM, no one knew I was coming back right then)) We divorce, they Marry and I had to pay child support to the Real father to raise his own kid. Court had the facts(were not in dispute) but didn't care.

So what your saying is, It doesn't matter, the fault or responsibility for the child fell on me, even though they set this up to happen this way. But the one part I did manage to mess up, I didn't come back in a body-bag. Made it all a bit more messy for them and no $20,000 lump payout.

Any Woman that does this to a man without his knowledge doesn't deserve his trust nor his support in life.

But I would guess I'm a bit biased. And have always wondered how they explained that other last name on the Birth Cert from a Naval Hospital, on a Marine Corps base.
180 posted on 08/30/2005 11:51:04 AM PDT by OldSgt. (USMC, Nam Vet, HMM-165)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson