[wallcrawlr]

Read it or Weep section of the Laura Ingraham show.

She had the Discovery Inst on the radio today discussing Intelligent Design.

http://www.lauraingraham.com/agnosticchart?charttype=minichart&chartID=23&formatID=1&useMiniChartID=true&destinationpage=/pg/jsp/general/readarchive.jsp

[wallcrawlr]

ping

Revelation 4:11
See my profile for info

[Tax-chick]

Cathy Young is supposed to be a libertarian, so why isn't she taking a no-exceptions "separation of school and state" position on this issue? One wouldn't expect that from the President, bless his well-intentioned heart, but "big-government libertarian" is surely on the list for "ultimate oxymoron."

[sandbar]

Hey, last night I watched From Ape to Man on the History channel and other than them taking waaaayyy too much liberty at describing what 'happened' when all they have are THEORIES, they said that the neantherdal man was a DIFFERENT SPECIES than modern humans. They are NOT our descendant as I had always been taught.

How do evolutionists explain this?

[ThirstyMan]

"A scientific hypothesis must be testable -- meaning that, if it is wrong, there should be a way to disprove it. (That's why assertions that there is no conclusive proof of evolution are basically pointless.)

What? That last sentence doesn't make sense.

''Intelligent design" boils down to the claim sarcastically summed up by aerospace engineer and science consultant Rand Simberg on his blog, Transterrestrial Musings: ''I'm not smart enough to figure out how this structure could evolve, therefore there must have been a designer."

Obviously an opponent of ID shouldn't be used as a source to define the ID movement. ID gets the cold shoulder from the secular materialists because it dares say that both Intelligence and Design are in evidence in our world.

[trubluolyguy]

I am a strong christian man, but I say do not teach theology of any kind in SCIENCE class. Just like Darwins' guess should not be taught until they find the missing link.

[Question_Assumptions]

The problem is that the issue is frames as God vs. Darwin. So long as evolutionists use the theory to promote the idea of a Godless universe, it's going to be controversial. Give people a choice betweeen God or Darwin, don't be surprised if lots of people pick God.

[MEGoody]

There is a great deal of fear in some circles when talk arises of teaching problems with evolution or teaching a theory that competes with evolution.

[proud_2_B_texasgal]

I wonder what Mr. Darwin thought when he was suddenly in the presence of his CREATOR....

[mudblood]

The topic has inspired me to ask outright: what is the freerepublic's official stance on Creation/Evolution? Does it even have one? I won't bother to give my views - do a search if you are curious. However, one of the problems I have with being a 'conservative' or a 'liberal' is that I always feel that by embracing that generality, I feel pressured to buy into a bunch of ideas that I don't believe in.

[Revolting cat!]

"Tell you what. Marx my words, that Darwin fellow was a freud!"