Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evolution vs. Intelligent Design
World Net Daily ^ | August 5, 2005 | Dr. Samuel L. Blumenfeld

Posted on 08/05/2005 9:50:00 AM PDT by wallcrawlr

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-390 next last
Dr. Samuel L. Blumenfeld is the author of eight books on education, including: "Is Public Education Necessary?" "NEA: Trojan Horse in American Education," "The Whole Language/OBE Fraud" and "Homeschooling: A Parents Guide to Teaching Children." His books are available on Amazon.com. Back issues of his incisive newsletter, The Blumenfeld Education Letter, are available online.
1 posted on 08/05/2005 9:50:00 AM PDT by wallcrawlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr

Oh, sweet fancy moses, another one?


2 posted on 08/05/2005 9:50:34 AM PDT by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past; ohioWfan; Tribune7; Tolkien; GrandEagle; Right in Wisconsin; Dataman; ..
Darwin also believed that all life originated from a single source – a kind of primeval slime in which the first living organisms formed spontaneously out of non-living matter through a random process – by accident.

The first false idea in the theory is that non-organic matter can transform itself into organic matter. Pasteur proved that this was impossible. Second, the enormous complexity of organic matter precludes accidental creation. There had to be a designer.


Revelation 4:11
See my profile for info

3 posted on 08/05/2005 9:50:45 AM PDT by wallcrawlr (http://www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr

This guy got his doctorate where, exactly? Clown College?


4 posted on 08/05/2005 9:52:35 AM PDT by WildHorseCrash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr

Darwin said absolutely nothing in his theory to support or deny abiogenesis.


5 posted on 08/05/2005 9:53:23 AM PDT by Tequila25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr
The first false idea in the theory is that non-organic matter can transform itself into organic matter. Pasteur proved that this was impossible.

Au contraire. Wohler proved 60 years previous to that that it could. What does this guy have a doctorate in? Basketweaving?

6 posted on 08/05/2005 9:53:37 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BikerNYC; PatrickHenry
Oh, sweet fancy moses, another one?

yep.

7 posted on 08/05/2005 9:54:27 AM PDT by King Prout (and the Clinton Legacy continues: like Herpes, it is a gift that keeps on giving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr
Intelligent Design is certainly proven by the fact that every living organism lives through a programmed cycle of birth, growth and, finally, death.

There, THAT settles it!

8 posted on 08/05/2005 9:54:48 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr
Intelligent Design is three things: a scientific research program that investigates the effects of intelligent causes; an intellectual movement that challenges Darwinism and its naturalistic legacy; and a way of understanding divine action ...

Nope, nope, and no.
9 posted on 08/05/2005 9:55:38 AM PDT by Redgirl (I actually voted for John Kerry before I voted against him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr
Solomon had a prescient observation in Ecclesiastes 3:11

" He hath made everything beautiful in its time: also he hath set eternity in their heart, yet so that man cannot find out the work that God hath done from the beginning even to the end. "

10 posted on 08/05/2005 9:56:09 AM PDT by Paul Ross (Strict Constructionist Definition=Someone who doesn't hallucinate when reading the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr
Second, the enormous complexity of organic matter precludes accidental creation. There had to be a designer.

There, THAT settles it!

11 posted on 08/05/2005 9:56:19 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr
But homeschoolers, although not affected by what the court forces on government schools, should know how to refute the fairy tale called the Theory of Evolution. Justice Brennan called it fact, which simply indicates the depth of his ignorance.

I'm sorry, but the ignorance is yours. Evolution does have a "factual basis," which is what Brennan said.

The reason that evolution and creation should not be treated equally in science class is that creation has no basis in science. It cannot possibly be tested by the scientific method.

Creationism is an appeal to religion, and therefore is a very appropriate subject for religion classes, philosophy classes or ethics classes. It has no scientific basis, so it has no place in a science class.

12 posted on 08/05/2005 9:57:01 AM PDT by highball ("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WildHorseCrash
This guy got his doctorate where, exactly? Clown College?

He has an 'honorary doctorate of law' from Bob Jones University.

In other words, brilliant guess! Who do you like for the superbowl?

Note to all; honorary doctorates aren't real degrees, and calling yourself 'Dr.' based on an honorary doctorate is close to fraud.

13 posted on 08/05/2005 9:58:00 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WildHorseCrash

Didn't take long for the ad hominems to start up. And which side started the name-calling? Why, what a surprise! It's the scientists.


14 posted on 08/05/2005 9:58:10 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tequila25

Oh, I found a quote from Darwin on the subject of abiogenesis, found in one of the later editions of The Origin of Species, "There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone circling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being evolved."


15 posted on 08/05/2005 9:58:13 AM PDT by Tequila25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WildHorseCrash
This guy got his doctorate where, exactly? Clown College?

The same place the Reverend Jackson got his Divinity Degree and Muslim Imams get theirs: In a box of Crackerjack, as the secret prize.

16 posted on 08/05/2005 9:58:39 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (The Fourth-Estate is a Fifth-Column!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr

"intermediary forms of species"

He states there being no intermediary forms of a species that you can point to. Natural Selection doesn't jump around from stage to stage, at least not intentially. All species should be considered in transition, and thus "intermediary". You won't find any three-legged horse ancestors - three-legged because they hadn't yet evolved that crutial 4th leg to make them real horses :)

Despite agreeing with the theory of natural selection, I'm also of the opinion that God could have put evolution in motion, possibly tipping things here and there with the odd comet or plague in order to realize her grand design.


17 posted on 08/05/2005 9:59:09 AM PDT by mudblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr
The first false idea in the theory is that non-organic matter can transform itself into organic matter. Pasteur proved that this was impossible. Second, the enormous complexity of organic matter precludes accidental creation. There had to be a designer.

Darwin's TOE does not address whether or not there was a designer. It explains how matter has evolved, over time.
18 posted on 08/05/2005 9:59:20 AM PDT by Redgirl (I actually voted for John Kerry before I voted against him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
Thanks, but this article isn't up to the standards of our ping list.
19 posted on 08/05/2005 9:59:54 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
"He hath made everything beautiful in its time"

All things dull and ugly, All creatures short and squat,
All things rude and nasty, The Lord God made the lot;
Each little snake that poisons, Each little wasp that stings,
He made their brutish venom, He made their horrid wings.
All things sick and cancerous, All evil great and small,
All things foul and dangerous, The Lord God made them all.
Each nasty little hornet, Each beastly little squid.
Who made the spiky urchin? Who made the sharks? He did.
All things scabbed and ulcerous, All pox both great and small.
Putrid, foul and gangrenous, The Lord God made them all.
20 posted on 08/05/2005 10:00:11 AM PDT by Moral Hazard ("I believe the children are the future" - Whitney Houston; "Fight the future" - X-files)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-390 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson