I'm shocked you guys are just so quick to jump on the bandwagon to bash Roberts based on this article.
I thought that lawyers had to do a job and whether they always agree with something they are working or not is not relevant. You want a lawyer that can be a good team player and keep an open mind.
Lawyers and judges have different obligations and different jobs. Am I missing something here on the clear differences between Lawyers and Judges???
I think Roberts is going to be a fine judge. I also think the left is running scared and will say/do anything to get the right all worked up about Roberts. Just think about all the crap coming out right now about him (the adoption, bs comparision to kennedys etc)
He DONATED his time to this. That says a lot.
Read the article. If true, he agreed with the gay cause in this case and helped strike down a law enacted by the people to halt the gay agenda.
Okay, that applies to all the cases he has argued regard abortion, too?
We're back to having a completely blank slate of a nominee, then, based on your logic. That isn't good enough.
The difference in this case is that Roberts donated his time for FREE. I content one doesn't do that unless one believes in the cause.
If conservatives as a whole are too stupid to demand a known originalist, we get what we deserve and have no right to complain about what the courts do.
I'm with you. His boss said I need help and he responded in the affirmative. I had to do something I did not want to do this week myself. Not gay rights, but just as ugly.
"I'm shocked you guys are just so quick to jump on the bandwagon to bash Roberts based on this article."
I'm not shocked. This bashing of conservatives
happens all the time by the conservater-than-thou
folks on FR. It has been said that the only army
in the world who kills its wounded is the church.
Seems to me that there's two groups who kill their
wounded. And not only on FR. Out on the street, too.