Okay, that applies to all the cases he has argued regard abortion, too?
We're back to having a completely blank slate of a nominee, then, based on your logic. That isn't good enough.
The difference in this case is that Roberts donated his time for FREE. I content one doesn't do that unless one believes in the cause.
If conservatives as a whole are too stupid to demand a known originalist, we get what we deserve and have no right to complain about what the courts do.