Skip to comments.
Environmental damage on Earth seen from shuttle
Reuters ^
| August 4, 2005
| Jeff Franks
Posted on 08/04/2005 8:07:09 AM PDT by goarmy
HOUSTON (Reuters) - Commander Eileen Collins said astronauts on shuttle Discovery had seen widespread environmental destruction on Earth and warned on Thursday that greater care was needed to protect natural resources.
Her comments came as NASA pondered whether to send astronauts out on an extra spacewalk to repair additional heat-protection damage on the first shuttle mission since the 2003 Columbia disaster.
Discovery is linked with the International Space Station and orbiting 220 miles above the Earth.
"Sometimes you can see how there is erosion, and you can see how there is deforestation. It's very widespread in some parts of the world," Collins said in a conversation from space with Japanese officials in Tokyo, including Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi.
"We would like to see, from the astronauts' point of view, people take good care of the Earth and replace the resources that have been used," said Collins, who was standing with Japanese astronaut Soichi Noguchi in front of a Japanese flag and holding a colorful fan.
Collins, flying her fourth shuttle mission, said the view from space made clear that Earth's atmosphere must be protected, too.
"The atmosphere almost looks like an eggshell on an egg, it's so very thin," she said. "We know that we don't have much air, we need to protect what we have."
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anthrreasontoditchit; astronuatesspms; badlogicalert; blahblahblah; discovery; earth; environment; greenschmeen; idiotsavant; jewishmomspacequeen; liberalyapfodder; rocketsciencenut; shuttle; sierracluborgasm; whoaskedyou
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 201-217 next last
To: Publius6961
I suspect that we are very unlikely ever to see Commander Collins on another shuttle flight, even if she was just mouthing someone else's words...Does that mean that Biden's going up on the next mission? He does so well with other people's words.
81
posted on
08/04/2005 8:42:05 AM PDT
by
Night Hides Not
(The only NOC list containing the name of Valerie Plame was stolen by Ethan Hunt.)
To: Sam Cree
Funny you say that...I was having this discussion with someone the other day.
When I last flew home from Europe, I noticed...there isn't much in the way of forested areas. Everything is a big quiltwork.
When I flew into Boston, I was amazed at the difference...it was HIGHLY forested. Is it just me?
82
posted on
08/04/2005 8:42:38 AM PDT
by
rlmorel
("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
To: Knitting A Conundrum
I agree with everything you said....
Do you agree that as much as envirowackos can be stupid, some of the knee jerk reactions here, reacting to some fairly benign observations about the planet from above, are not better, only equal-and-opposite stupid?
83
posted on
08/04/2005 8:44:36 AM PDT
by
HairOfTheDog
(Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
To: liberallarry
Well, you certainly aren't educated. What newsworthy about the article is precisely what you ridicule - that the damage is so widespread that it can be observed with the naked eye from spaceTo a kid with a hammer, everything he sees is a nail.
A more educated, balanced and useful view of the facts would be:
Had the shuttle been orbiting 120 years ago, when the primary source of power was coal and wood, would the view from space be better or worse?
84
posted on
08/04/2005 8:50:32 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
To: brytlea
85
posted on
08/04/2005 8:51:47 AM PDT
by
scott7278
(Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I would like to know what we are talking about.)
To: Wolverine
Yes and deforestation , Its called suburbs.
Give me a break. Why doesnt she tend to the mission and leave her envirowhacko thoughts to herself.
To: Individual Rights in NJ
No one educated could make such a ludacris statement based on naked eye visual observation. Let's leave the rappers out of this, please. :)
Whether or not Commander Collins has a personal opinion, the point is that it's inappropriate to make political statements on a shuttle mission. I think you grasp that point pretty well!
To: HairOfTheDog
Do you agree that as much as envirowackos can be stupid, some of the knee jerk reactions here, reacting to some fairly benign observations about the planet from above, are not better, only equal-and-opposite stupid?Sharing your opinion is lovely, but can you be more specific? Examples please?
And what exactly is "benign" about mouthing junk-science platitudes?
88
posted on
08/04/2005 9:00:19 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
To: xrp
Jesus...you put the image I thought of as soon as I read those words from this pinhead.
89
posted on
08/04/2005 9:01:13 AM PDT
by
My Favorite Headache
("Scientology is dangerous stuff,it's like forming a religion based around Johnny Quest and Haji.")
Comment #90 Removed by Moderator
To: Mind-numbed Robot
Eileen honey, get a grip, do you recall hearing about something call the Wisconsin Glacier? melted between 5,000 to 10,000 years ago, stretched from Wisconsin to Georgia was about 3 to 5 miles thick, ring a bell?
Well sweetie when it melted the out-wash created Southern NJ,Delaware, the Eastern Shores, the Outer Banks and Florida to name a few. This out-wash is called EROSION and it happened before the civilization existed. As for deforestation, what do you suppose happened to all the trees and plants when the Glasier passed through.
Just what we need, an other dim bulb, PC hack.
To: zzen01
Maybe it is, but it is true, too. And, why not have politics in outer space when it is the same people who a short time ago were deciding how to vote for one or another office. Different movie?
92
posted on
08/04/2005 9:04:20 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and open the Land Office)
To: jtminton
I rarely take environmental advice from astronauts who rely on hyrdocarbon-based methods to take their plastic and polymer based shuttles into space.
Just how much damage does a shuttle launch do to the environment, anyway?
To: goarmy
Sometimes you can see how there is erosion wow Erosion, when did that start... /sarcasm
94
posted on
08/04/2005 9:07:21 AM PDT
by
N3WBI3
(If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a permit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
To: goarmy
"Sometimes you can see how there is erosion, and you can see how there is deforestation. It's very widespread in some parts of the world,"
She's right. There is alot of erosion and deforestation in the American southwest:
It's just too bad that we humans caused all of this erosion. Just think of the flat tree-filled world we used to live in. Mother Earth is crying.
95
posted on
08/04/2005 9:11:49 AM PDT
by
freakboy
To: goarmy
The atmosphere looks like an eggshell on an egg its so very thin? Is she talking about the aprox. 110 km thick atmosphere? Is she talking about the atmosphere, including the thermosphere, through which the shuttle is traveling?
Basic science should be required knowledge for all astronauts.
To: Publius6961
Oh - I don't think I need to cite examples. All I'm saying is, if you get so paranoid and embittered that anyone who cares to notice the beauty of the earth, or the possibility that man should and can improve our impact, is somehow the enemy of Republican thought, then you lose me. I care about it. Relax.
I don't think anything she said should be considered contrary to any political platform. Who ~doesn't~ want wise use and replenishment of resources?
97
posted on
08/04/2005 9:13:27 AM PDT
by
HairOfTheDog
(Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
To: HairOfTheDog
"Do we have to be so paranoid about politics that our knee jerk reaction to environmentalism is that it's completely unnecessary? "
I've noticed that some of the things that freepers accuse the left of doing... freepers do as well. This dogmatic approach to environmentalism helps no one.
There are many rational folks here who recognize the need to be conservative when it comes to the environment. But when something related to environmentalism in any way comes up, they bash it, relentlessly. Dogma. Synchophants.
I think global warming is junk science. But I do believe in climate change.
I think the left does a disservice by promoting junk science, and trying to brow beat people into adopting their agenda.
I think the right does a disservice when they mock all things related to environmental concerns, and spin hard to make those concerned with the environment look like kooks.
And then there is the contingent here that couldn't care less about the environment, country, community, or family. They just want to make $1 more this week than they did last week.
98
posted on
08/04/2005 9:15:29 AM PDT
by
brownsfan
(It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
To: Sam Cree
The US is reported more forested now than when the first settlers came.
99
posted on
08/04/2005 9:17:25 AM PDT
by
Ingtar
(Understanding is a three-edged sword : your side, my side, and the truth in between ." -- Kosh)
To: liberateUS
Just how much damage does a shuttle launch do to the environment, anyway? Probably more than my Chevy pickup.
100
posted on
08/04/2005 9:18:39 AM PDT
by
jtminton
(Help stop second hand rap!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 201-217 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson