Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eleni121
Darwin did enough damage without he himself getting into the social sciences

Is this your way of retreating from your clearly debunked claim that Darwin advanced abhorrent social sciences?

however, his work definitely belongs in that realm rather than science.

And your credentials on the matter are? And your rebuttal to the mountains of evidence that have been presented for evolution are?

Or are you just going to sit and shout "MARX" and "HITLER", as if that means anything.

What most creationists wish for is that darwinism and Evolution be taught as theory not as fact.

It is taught as theory. You want to distort the meaning of "theory" with respect to scientific context and insist that evolution be taught as wild-ass speculation, when it most certainly is more than that.

Why don't you want gravity taught as "theory" instead of fact, or electromagnetism or atomics? Those are all theories, taught with the same level of certainty as evolution even though some are actually less certain in their respective scientific fields, but there's no major outcry.

You want the significance of evolution to be reduced not because there's anything wrong with the theory or how it is taught, but because it offends your religious sensibilities. When facts and reality contradict your religious beliefs, you can't readjust your beliefs, so you simply try to stamp out teaching about reality.

Finally as there is no evidence for Darwin's evolution,

You either haven't been paying attention, or you are a liar. I'm leaning toward the latter.
1,368 posted on 08/03/2005 1:24:05 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1349 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio

My credentials? No I am not a biological scientist but I don't let Darwin or Marx or anyone else tell me how and what to think. The classoroom should allow the students that same freedom from conformity.

Chew on this:


"'...It is easy enough to make up stories of how one form gave rise to another, and to find reasons why the stages should be favoured by natural selection. But such stories are not part of science, for there is no way of putting them to the test.'

Personal letter (written 10 April 1979) from Dr. Colin Patterson, Senior Palaeontologist at the British Museum of Natural History in London, to Luther D. Sunderland, Master Books, San Diego, USA, 1984, p.89 in 'Darwin's Enigma' by Luther D. Sunderland."


1,377 posted on 08/03/2005 1:43:49 PM PDT by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1368 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson