Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WillMalven

Marx to Engels on Darwin:

"Darwin's book is very important and serves me as a natural scientific basis for the class struggle in history. One has to put up with the crude English method of development, of course."




The above letter to Darwin clearly states Marx's admiration for the old man. Wishing it were not so doesn't change the reality of that.


1,276 posted on 08/03/2005 9:56:40 AM PDT by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1258 | View Replies ]


To: eleni121

The letter you posted is a hoax.


1,279 posted on 08/03/2005 10:04:45 AM PDT by bobdsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1276 | View Replies ]

To: eleni121

So again I say by implication you are a follower of Hitler because you are a Christian, and Hitler embraced Christianity.


1,282 posted on 08/03/2005 10:08:05 AM PDT by WillMalven (It don't matter where you are when "the bomb" goes off, as long as you can say "What was that?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1276 | View Replies ]

To: eleni121
"The above letter to Darwin clearly states Marx's admiration for the old man. Wishing it were not so doesn't change the reality of that."

Marx did admire Darwin. Darwin did not know Marx. Any relationship you perceive in this was one way. Any link between Marx and Darwin, whether true or not, has no bearing on either the validity of evolution nor on the development of the theory of evolution. It does not change the views or the practices of the scientists involved in any evolutionary field.

I really have no idea why you insist on making the link and then try to convince us it matters.

1,292 posted on 08/03/2005 10:53:07 AM PDT by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1276 | View Replies ]

To: eleni121

Don't forget that Marx offered to dedicate Das Kapital to Darwin. Of course, Darwin declined the "honor" because Darwin correctly understood that his biological theory did not translate to proper social science, but don't let facts get in the way of your mindless attempt to falsely imply that Darwin somehow advocated badly-designed social systems.


1,326 posted on 08/03/2005 12:06:24 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1276 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson