To: leftcoaster
Novak recently said that after October, when he is free to speak, people were going to be very surprised about his source. Any background on Harlow? I'm hoping that this investigation by Fitzgerald leads back to the malcontents at CIA and State who are eager to discredit anything Bush does. It will be interesting to hear who initiated the investigation from CIA and why. Rove appears to be a red herring.
To: pieces of time
Well, he appears to be giving Harlow as a "clue". I'm going to assume that Harlow and the Wilson's are intertwined.
115 posted on
08/01/2005 5:38:32 AM PDT by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: pieces of time
To: pieces of time
Novak recently said that after October, when he is free to speak, people were going to be very surprised about his source. No, that's not what he said. He said people would be surprised about the details of the story. Harlow is not a surprise, per se. It's merely interesting that he came out publicly lying last week. But that's a buttress of my original point about this whole story--that we had a CIA passing out lies to reporters.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson