Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: leftcoaster
Novak recently said that after October, when he is free to speak, people were going to be very surprised about his source. Any background on Harlow? I'm hoping that this investigation by Fitzgerald leads back to the malcontents at CIA and State who are eager to discredit anything Bush does. It will be interesting to hear who initiated the investigation from CIA and why. Rove appears to be a red herring.
104 posted on 08/01/2005 5:24:20 AM PDT by pieces of time
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: pieces of time

Well, he appears to be giving Harlow as a "clue". I'm going to assume that Harlow and the Wilson's are intertwined.


115 posted on 08/01/2005 5:38:32 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

To: pieces of time

I think you're spot-on.


164 posted on 08/01/2005 7:20:34 AM PDT by Gulf War One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

To: pieces of time
Novak recently said that after October, when he is free to speak, people were going to be very surprised about his source.

No, that's not what he said. He said people would be surprised about the details of the story. Harlow is not a surprise, per se. It's merely interesting that he came out publicly lying last week. But that's a buttress of my original point about this whole story--that we had a CIA passing out lies to reporters.

196 posted on 08/01/2005 8:26:49 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson