Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Space Shuttle Fleet Grounded!
NASA sources | MB26

Posted on 07/27/2005 3:25:59 PM PDT by MindBender26

NASA realizes debris that fell of external fuel tank yesterday came close to causing irrepairable damage to shuttle now in orbit.

Fleet GROUNDED. More later

Chances to return to flight again, no better than 50/50.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government
KEYWORDS: deadlyfoam; enviromentalists; governmentprogram; grounded; nasa; rutan; shuttlediscovery; spaceprogram; spaceshuttle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 541-552 next last
To: You Dirty Rats

"The real problem is using manned missions to send cargo up into low earth orbit."


Very true. If we can fly UAVs from halfway around the planet we can certainly launch and dock cargo without an onboard pilot.


201 posted on 07/27/2005 4:22:16 PM PDT by cripplecreek (If you must obey your party, may your chains rest lightly upon your shoulders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one

Thx!
That's worth posting as part of the thread:

Thank fussy "environmentalists" from the Clinton administration for the substandard but politically correct foam that NASA thinks caused the Columbia disaster.

"NASA engineers have known for at least five years that insulating foam could peel off the space shuttle's external fuel tanks and damage the vital heat-protecting tiles that the space agency says were the likely 'root cause' of Saturday's shuttle disaster," the left-of-center Philadelphia Inquirer noted today in an article by Knight Ridder News Service.

So why was such a crummy substance used in such a crucial capacity, with the lives of seven astronauts at stake? Because "environmentalists" fretting about their theory of human-caused "global warming" wanted to use it.

In a 1997 report, NASA mechanical systems engineer Greg Katnik "noted that the 1997 mission, STS-87, was the first to use a new method of 'foaming' the tanks, one designed to address NASA's goal of using environmentally friendly products. The shift came as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was ordering many industries to phase out the use of Freon, an aerosol propellant linked to ozone depletion and global warming," Knight Ridder reported.

Insulation is sprayed on the shuttle's tanks to keep the super-cooled hydrogen and oxygen fuels at the correct temperature.

Before the P.C. new insulation was used, about 40 of the spacecraft's 26,000 ceramic tiles would sustain damage in missions. However, Katnik reported that NASA engineers found 308 "hits" to Columbia after a 1997 flight.

A "massive material loss on the side of the external tank" caused much of the damage, Katnik wrote in an article in Space Team Online.

He called the damage "significant." One hundred thirty-two hits were bigger than 1 inch in diameter, and some slashes were as long as 15 inches.

Most frighteningly, some slashes cut three-quarters of the way into the 2-inch-deep tiles, near the ship's aluminum skin, which burns at only 350 degrees. More than 100 tiles had to be replaced - 11 times more than in a previous mission that had used foam made with politically incorrect Freon.

"As recently as last September, a retired engineering manager for Lockheed Martin, the contractor that assembles the tanks, told a conference in New Orleans that developing a new foam to meet environmental standards had 'been much more difficult than anticipated,'" Knight-Ridder wrote.

The engineer, who helped design the thermal protection system, said that switching from the Freon foam "resulted in unanticipated program impacts, such as foam loss during flight."


202 posted on 07/27/2005 4:22:29 PM PDT by djf (Government wants the same things I do - MY guns, MY property, MY freedoms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks

All they need to do is get some Herculiner spray on Bed Liner. Then it won't peel, chip, or flake! Here is some more information from the website. This is a unique, advanced-formula, do-it-yourself, any color you want protective coating for truck beds and SPACE SHUTTLES. This ready-to-use, textured polyurethane coating looks great and protects your vehicle. Skid resistant textured surface won't peel, chip, or flake! Bonds and seals all surfaces to prevent rust, resist gasoline, oil, solvents, and chemicals. Easy to apply: just clean and prepare the surface, brush or roll on the ready-to-use coating, and allow to dry!


203 posted on 07/27/2005 4:23:02 PM PDT by Ramtek57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Aeronaut

I imagine this one will be in the Breaking News leaders for a while, but you may want to ping the usual gang.


204 posted on 07/27/2005 4:23:27 PM PDT by IonImplantGuru ("Me? You talking to me? You talkin' to me? Then [BLEEP]... Well, I'm the only one here.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

Thank you for posting that long article. It covered very nearly everything.
Well done.


205 posted on 07/27/2005 4:23:52 PM PDT by meema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
they could turn around and relaunch in a couple of weeks...

Man, I wish I could have what they were smokin' when they thought that!

206 posted on 07/27/2005 4:23:56 PM PDT by Go_Raiders ("Being able to catch well in a crowd just means you can't get open, that's all." -- James Lofton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

OK, sorry, I misunderestimated your first statement. I didn't realize that your reference to "the next generation shuttle" was for a vehicle radically different than the present model.


207 posted on 07/27/2005 4:24:03 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (WE WILL WIN WITH W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan

Nail. Head.

Yep.


208 posted on 07/27/2005 4:24:09 PM PDT by glock rocks (give a man a program - frustrate him for a day... teach a man to program - frustrate him for life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

It's one thing to risk lives in cutting edge technology - that's the price of innovation. It's quite another thing when you have a ship that's a quarter century old with known problems - that's a blasted waste of lives and money for no good purpose.


209 posted on 07/27/2005 4:24:50 PM PDT by thoughtomator (frotho ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

Damn enviro wackos.


210 posted on 07/27/2005 4:25:04 PM PDT by b4its2late (Suicidal Blond Twin Kills Sister By Mistake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

I've got the solution! Sell the whole Shuttle program (and NASA) to the Chinese. They can use all the environmentally nasty stuff since they are a developing nation and they can do whatever the hell they please (the Kyoto clause). Then we can buy the Shuttles from them for about half the price we makes them. And, since they have no value for human life, we can hire Chinese crew to fly the thing for us. They can even plant the first American flag on Mars for us and we can sit back and watch it on our Chinese wide screen HDTVs.


211 posted on 07/27/2005 4:25:11 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats
? The shuttle is NOT separate from a "launcher"

The russian shuttle did not have the engine on the orbiter. Neither did several of the designs considered when our shuttle was being planned.
212 posted on 07/27/2005 4:25:17 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan

Nuclear power plants, too. Heck, even nuclear powered rockets.


213 posted on 07/27/2005 4:25:39 PM PDT by RightWhale (Substance is essentially the relationship of accidents to itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Mad Mammoth
Good evening.

Leaving the shuttle docked to the I.S.S. is a better idea, to my mind.

It would provide extra space and emergency atmosphere and it is a fine laboratory/repair shop.

We could rotate crews and resupply using the Russian ships and the shuttle could act as a last resort escape vehicle.

We will come up with a replacement system in time and the shuttle/ISS could be retired and turned into a museum in orbit.

Michael Frazier
214 posted on 07/27/2005 4:25:44 PM PDT by brazzaville (No surrender,no retreat. Well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan
Until a few years ago, they used a different foam on the tanks. A foam that worked beautifully and didn't come flying off and knocking chunks of the orbiter off.

correct. It is amazing that the wimps at NASA didn't stand up say "F**K this ozone scare. We are building the tanks like before." But nooooooo, everyone has the insane bureaucratic mentality. I wonder if anyone at all somewhere in the government "pushed" to have the foam applied the old way instead of the liberal-pc way?

215 posted on 07/27/2005 4:25:58 PM PDT by liberty2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Normal4me

An organizational restructuring at NASA is imperative at this time. Whether or not I would support additional funding is dependent on the quality of post-restructuring processes, initiatives, competencies, etc.


216 posted on 07/27/2005 4:26:12 PM PDT by jdm (The answer to the extra credit question on a Columbia U exam is always choice C: "Bush's Fault.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
I think the best solution is to find a way to slow the shuttle down to less than 9038479385 miles per hour before hitting the atmosphere.

Doesn't work that way. Orbital mechanics dictates your velocity against your height above the Earth. As the system is designed, velocity is traded off for heat and friction once you come in contact with the atmosphere during the re-entry phase.

217 posted on 07/27/2005 4:27:07 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: djf
<a href=http://www.cite.your.source/and-links-to/cool_article>
Text that you want the user to click on</a>

The "a href=" inside angle brackets contains the URL the person clicking will be directed to. The "/a" in angle brackets contains the visible text in the reader's browser.

You might check out the HTML sandbox thread too, for more examples. When posting an article, there is a space to just type in the URL, without the "a href", "/a" or angle bracket stuff.

218 posted on 07/27/2005 4:27:37 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault
we can hire Chinese crew to fly the thing for us.

Wow. Excellent. And... sticky rice is a whole bunch cheaper than the foodstuffs we're using :o)

219 posted on 07/27/2005 4:27:49 PM PDT by glock rocks (give a man a program - frustrate him for a day... teach a man to program - frustrate him for life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo
"This is a test flight."

BU&&SH!+!!! You don't send 7 people up (one is a Japanese guestronaut for cryin' out loud) on a test flight!

220 posted on 07/27/2005 4:28:21 PM PDT by Go_Raiders ("Being able to catch well in a crowd just means you can't get open, that's all." -- James Lofton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 541-552 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson