Skip to comments.
NASA examining images showing debris falling from Discovery
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/topstory2/3282060 ^
Posted on 07/26/2005 4:18:07 PM PDT by ConservativeDude
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: ConservativeDude
Where's Gorilla Glue when you need it.
21
posted on
07/26/2005 4:48:41 PM PDT
by
hershey
To: gopwinsin04
Oh that. It was just the Enterprise coming back to witness a momentous lift-off.
22
posted on
07/26/2005 4:48:44 PM PDT
by
Textide
To: konaice
Should be 'separation', also.
To: robertpaulsen
Should be 'separation', also.Too busy correcting my errors to correct my spelling. ;-)
24
posted on
07/26/2005 4:50:52 PM PDT
by
konaice
To: gopwinsin04
Per USA today:
A 1 1/2-inch-wide bit of tile captured on camera appeared to fly off the shuttle's belly, on the edge of a door that encloses the nose landing gear. It was not clear if the tile had been struck by anything. Pieces of tile, which protect the shuttle from searing heat on return to Earth, have been lost on past flights without preventing a safe homecoming.
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/2005-07-26-shuttle-debris_x.htm
25
posted on
07/26/2005 4:56:04 PM PDT
by
konaice
To: Textide
Mr. Worf, Phasers on stun!!!
26
posted on
07/26/2005 4:58:22 PM PDT
by
Trueblackman
(Terrorism and Liberalism never sleep and neither do I)
To: hershey
As long as they have duct tape they'll be fine.
27
posted on
07/26/2005 5:04:54 PM PDT
by
Sabatier
To: All
ALL MYGOD!1!1111!~!!!! DEBRIS HIT IT THEY ARE ALL GOING TO DIE!!!!! Po0000r birdie :(
gawd I am sick of the media sounds like they want something to go wrong
28
posted on
07/26/2005 5:09:09 PM PDT
by
Kewlhand`tek
(What the hell was that? I hope it was outgoing!)
To: ConservativeDude
Discovery's liftoff marks the beginning of the end for the space shuttle fleet, which launched the first of its 114 flights in April 1981.
As a result of the Columbia tragedy, President Bush directed NASA to retire the remaining orbiters -- Atlantis, Endeavour and Discovery -- by 2010 and accelerate the development of a successor that will transport American astronauts back to the moon as well as back and forth to the space station.
Do we have any info on the proposed successor shuttle program?
29
posted on
07/26/2005 5:11:20 PM PDT
by
ARCADIA
(Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
To: diverteach
Actually they have the capability to do that with the Canada-arm. But more useful than that would be closeup photographs (since the shuttle is a big spacecraft, it would take a long spacewalk to do a full inspection). They are going to do this by pitching over prior to docking with the International Space Station. For about 8 minutes, the ISS crew will photograph in detail the space shuttle. These will be transmitted to Earth where scientists and engineers can examine them in much more detail.
Don't worry, they will at least understand what the damage is in the next couple of days. Per the mission timeline, they will do the pitch over maneuver at 6:08 ET on Thursday just before docking.
30
posted on
07/26/2005 5:13:35 PM PDT
by
burzum
To: ConservativeDude
Uh-oh! Praying that everything is minor.
31
posted on
07/26/2005 5:18:44 PM PDT
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: ARCADIA
The
wikipedia article on the CEV is pretty useful. NASA has not yet decided the final design specs for the CEV, but is taking inputs from several companies. You can get more information from each of their product pages. In general, though, the CEV will be a capsule design with either an Apollo-like stack of rockets or Shuttle derived technology. It is highly unlikely that the CEV capsule will be reusable. This drastically reduces the complexity on several issues (especially on how to protect the heat shield).
32
posted on
07/26/2005 5:19:52 PM PDT
by
burzum
To: diverteach
They have a new robotic arm that can put a camera all over the exterior.
33
posted on
07/26/2005 5:23:06 PM PDT
by
Veloxherc
(To go up pull back, to go down pull back all the way.)
To: buccaneer81
Expensive (training, suit usage, time lost from other pursuits) and risky (only a matter of time before an astronaut's suit is holed by dust or debris.) expensive, relative to what? seven lives and a shuttle? risky, relative to what? complete loss on re-entry? puh-leeze.
34
posted on
07/26/2005 5:25:18 PM PDT
by
the invisib1e hand
(In Honor of Terri Schiavo. *check my FReeppage for the link* Let it load and have the sound on.)
To: DoughtyOne
Actually, let them protest around the shuttle. Especially at around T-minus 5 seconds to liftoff.
To: Ez2BRepub
There may be something to that idea.
36
posted on
07/26/2005 5:30:39 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
To: burzum
It sounds like a technological step backwards. Its no wonder that we haven't seen much about the conceptual design. Is there any new technology here or is it just a boondoggle?
37
posted on
07/26/2005 5:31:39 PM PDT
by
ARCADIA
(Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
To: the invisib1e hand
expensive, relative to what? When you have a budget at NASA that is routinely outpaced by foodstamps, horny toad research and midnight basketball, you learn to make do. $15 billion is pissing in the ocean.
38
posted on
07/26/2005 5:32:22 PM PDT
by
buccaneer81
(Rick Nash will score 50 goals this season ( if there is a season)
To: ConservativeDude
OK, I have a question. When the capsules for the moon missions were launched, they were encased in a plastic shell that I believe was attached to the tower on the top of the capsule that had the escape engines on it. Once it was in space it jettisoned the cover and escape tower.
My question is, why can't they have a cover over the vulnerable carbon carbon leading edges of the wings that are then jettisoned once the shuttle is in space. It's not like it needs the aerodynamic surfaces until it re-enters the atmosphere.
I know we have some serious experts here on FR, I remember all of the analysis after Columbia and FR had more, video, pictures and correct theories than NASA had at the time.
39
posted on
07/26/2005 5:37:24 PM PDT
by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
To: ARCADIA
My proposal is transporters! You know the beam kind.
40
posted on
07/26/2005 5:38:04 PM PDT
by
mad_as_he$$
(Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson