Skip to comments.
We need more giant leaps for mankind
Newsday ^
| 07/25/05
| BRUCE MURRAY
Posted on 07/25/2005 7:10:57 PM PDT by KevinDavis
How significant is NASA's delay of the launch of Space Shuttle Discovery?
Certainly NASA can be expected to be especially cautious when trying to return to flight for the first time since Columbia and its intrepid crew were lost during re-entry in February 2003. This tragedy came 17 years after Challenger suffered a similarly televised demise with the violent loss of another seven crew members.
But no amount of engineering caution can make space flight perfectly safe. The speeds and heating rates are extreme, and the technology is unavoidably pushed close to its limits. Every human flight carries a potentially deadly risk. Thus, every human space flight must pursue mission objectives worth dying for.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nasa; shuttlediscovery; space; thefuture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
There will be more accidents down the road. Life is about taking risks and chances.. We can't play it safe forever...
To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; ...
2
posted on
07/25/2005 7:11:51 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(the space/future belongs to the eagles, the earth/past to the groundhogs)
To: KevinDavis
That is true Kevin, but it would be helpful if the next catastrophic failure doesn't involve something NASA knew for certain was a problem in months, weeks or even days prior to the launch.
3
posted on
07/25/2005 7:15:25 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
To: DoughtyOne
4
posted on
07/25/2005 7:16:27 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(the space/future belongs to the eagles, the earth/past to the groundhogs)
To: KevinDavis
I appreciate your threads. Thanks again.
5
posted on
07/25/2005 7:18:41 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
To: KevinDavis
I wish I were waking at midnight and suiting up!
6
posted on
07/25/2005 7:19:59 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: KevinDavis
I think one of mankind's greatest, under-reported space leaps was just a few months ago. Back when Burt Rutan and Co. captured the X-Prize. His genius designs got his ship up into the "wild black yonder" with a proportionally small budget and no heat tiles for the return. Was a stunning thing to behold.
To: KevinDavis
8
posted on
07/25/2005 7:23:36 PM PDT
by
Prime Choice
(Thanks to the Leftists, yesterday's deviants are today's "alternate lifestyles.")
To: KevinDavis
once bitten, twice shy, man. We don't have enough of those shuttles to afford atomizing another one - let alone losing another crew of the best this planet has to offer.
Anyone know if we have plans to build a non-atari powered shuttle in the near future? I know of the mission to the moon/mars and a space worthy C130 is certainly in order if we are to populate the moon.
9
posted on
07/25/2005 7:24:50 PM PDT
by
kerryusama04
(Walkin' the tightrope between the lost and found.)
To: myheroesareDeadandRegistered
I think one of mankind's greatest, under-reported space leaps was just a few months ago. Back when Burt Rutan and Co. captured the X-Prize. I think what they did was great for an exclusive private venture, but what they did would have been impossible had NASA not paved the way through its innovations over the past 40 years.
In short, Rutan went to incredible heights...but only because he stood on the shoulders of giants.
10
posted on
07/25/2005 7:25:06 PM PDT
by
Prime Choice
(Thanks to the Leftists, yesterday's deviants are today's "alternate lifestyles.")
To: myheroesareDeadandRegistered
Hear, hear. If NASA was serious at all it would put Rutan in charge of its spacecraft program.
11
posted on
07/25/2005 7:28:38 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(How many liberties shall we give up to maintain the pretense that we are not at war with Islam?)
To: Prime Choice
That's a great shot of Columbia at liftoff. Columbia was the only orbiter that had the photo pod on the tail fin.
Good luck and Godspeed to the crew of STS-114 Discovery.
12
posted on
07/25/2005 7:39:59 PM PDT
by
NCC-1701
(ISLAM IS A CULT!!!!! IT MUST BE ERADICATED FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH.)
To: thoughtomator
If NASA was serious at all it would put Rutan in charge of its spacecraft program. Bah. Rutan has only recently done what NASA did 40+ years ago with 1960s technology.
Let me know when Rutan gets a man on the moon and returns him safely to the Earth. Then we'll have something worth talking about.
13
posted on
07/25/2005 7:51:30 PM PDT
by
Prime Choice
(Thanks to the Leftists, yesterday's deviants are today's "alternate lifestyles.")
To: Prime Choice
Yeah, but what did Rutan spend vs. what NASA spent?
14
posted on
07/25/2005 7:52:54 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(How many liberties shall we give up to maintain the pretense that we are not at war with Islam?)
To: thoughtomator
Yeah, but what did Rutan spend vs. what NASA spent? So you're telling me the latecomers who follow what the inventors and developers did are on par with those who actually did it first?
So, in your book, anyone who understands the theory of Relativity is as much a genius as the man who first conceived the idea?
As I've said before: Rutan only went as high as he has because he stood on the shoulders of giants. If NASA hadn't paved the way, he wouldn't have been able to skateboard on it.
15
posted on
07/25/2005 7:57:50 PM PDT
by
Prime Choice
(Thanks to the Leftists, yesterday's deviants are today's "alternate lifestyles.")
To: kerryusama04
a non-atari powered shuttle It appears there will be two derivative vehicles based on Space Shuttle tech to a degree, but both would be far more robust than the Space Shuttle. One would be man-rated and would carry crew to and from orbit and also to the moon and return. The other would be an unmanned freighter with a large throw weight.
16
posted on
07/25/2005 7:59:08 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Substance is essentially the relationship of accidents to itself)
To: Prime Choice
As I've said before: Rutan only went as high as he has because he stood on the shoulders of giants. If NASA hadn't paved the way, he wouldn't have been able to skateboard on it. It can also be said that NASA stood on the shoulders of giants. The big deal with Rutan is speed, efficiency, innovation, and enthusiasm.
17
posted on
07/25/2005 8:03:50 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
To: Moonman62
It can also be said that NASA stood on the shoulders of giants. Which giants? Name them.
The big deal with Rutan is speed, efficiency, innovation, and enthusiasm.
Yeah...and going from earthbound to landing on the moon in eight short years is the work of slackers. Sure...
18
posted on
07/25/2005 8:11:49 PM PDT
by
Prime Choice
(Thanks to the Leftists, yesterday's deviants are today's "alternate lifestyles.")
To: Prime Choice
Let's talk about what they are doing now. NASA spends its time flying a 35-year-old spacecraft that probably costs as much just to launch as it would take Rutan to build one of similar capability from scratch.
If NASA intends to be the world's elite space program, it needs as many Rutans as it can find. Another shuttle launch doesn't give much confidence that they're on the right track.
19
posted on
07/25/2005 8:16:41 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(How many liberties shall we give up to maintain the pretense that we are not at war with Islam?)
To: Prime Choice
Goddard, all the German rocket scientists, and everyone that worked on ICBM's.
I didn't say NASA didn't have a great accomplishment with the Apollo program. It did. It also had a blank check and all the resources of the country. As I stated in my post, Rutan's achievement was done in a different way.
20
posted on
07/25/2005 8:18:37 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson