You de-legimitize yourself by even bothering to respond to such logic. Assume for a moment that the US has, over its 230 year existence, opposed Muslims (oppressed in their parlance) to the extent that, say India, has. You know, a couple of million or so killed during/after the 1948 partition.
Would such prior actions justify (or help explain) the acts of violence we're seeing today? And, as Victor David Hansen astutely pointed out, how come we don't see any retaliation against India?
The very idea that the US is to blame was merely a trial-ballon sent up to test the market response. In a pre-PC world, it would have been laughed at as no different from something uttered from Tokyo Rose.
But the muzzies got lucky because the US hating left provided them a willing and receptive audience. The muzzies don't believe it any more than the left; it merely satisifies both of their conditions for hating the West.
I only respond because some actually believe the stupidity.
It just needs to be pointed out that Islam has destroyed every country where they are in control.
Women in such cult governments are treated like the Jews under Hitler IMO.
The leaders of this failed culture can't point to themselves for the failures, because if they did, they would be killed and their cult would be abandoned by many. So at this point, the failed leaders point to the West, claim we are the problem and their cult members buy it.
I also agree with you 100% that our left, like Kennedy totally enable the terrorists with their attempts to sabotage the soldiers and backing of this war.
The Democrat party is a criminal enterprise IMO at this point.