Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Endorses Moon-to-Mars Plans
Space.com ^ | 22 July 2004 | Andrew Taylor

Posted on 07/23/2005 4:14:04 AM PDT by demlosers

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The House Friday overwhelmingly endorsed President Bush's vision to send man back to the moon and eventually on to Mars as it passed a bill to set NASA policy for the next two years.

The bill passed 383-15 after a collegial debate in which lawmakers stressed their commitment to not just Bush's ambitious space exploration plans but also to traditional NASA programs such as science and aeronautics.

There is some tension between Congress and the White House over the balance between Bush's vision for space exploration and other NASA initiatives. Originally, the measure would have shifted $1.3 billion in funds from exploration to other NASA programs. But after administration objections lawmakers added the money back to the budget for exploration during floor debate. That was done by adding to the bill's bottom line -- now at $34.7 billion -- not at the expense of science and aeronautics.

Democratic Rep. Bart Gordon of Tennessee said Bush's ambitious moon and Mars missions "should not be done by cannibalizing other NASA missions.''

The bill is the first NASA policy measure -- its budget is funded by a separate bill -- to pass the House in five years. It advanced as the space agency tries to rebound from the Columbia disaster in February 2003 with the launch of the space shuttle Discovery next Tuesday.

The measure permits but does not explicitly endorse retiring the space shuttle fleet by 2010, as the administration would like to do. It directs the agency to launch a new crew exploration vehicle -- which would lack the full capabilities of the shuttle but could travel to the International Space Station -- as close to 2010 as feasible.

NASA's plans call for a new vehicle to be ready by 2014, which unnerves lawmakers who do not want the United States to have to rely on other countries to catch a lift to the space station.

A companion Senate measure approved by the Commerce, Science and Transportation panel last month would bar NASA from retiring the shuttle before a replacement vehicle is ready.

Both House and Senate bills also endorse a servicing and repair mission to the Hubble Space Telescope. Without such a mission, the Hubble will fail when its gyroscopes and batteries wear out in the next few years, but the agency has not announced whether to let the telescope fail or whether it will undertake a costly manned repair mission.

"Congress endorses the President's Vision for Space Exploration,'' said Rep. Sherwood Boehlert, R-N.Y. "The United States will work to return to the moon by 2020, and then will move on to other destinations.''

The full Senate has yet to act on the NASA measure.

Regardless of the ringing endorsement Friday, NASA must still compete with other agencies for its budget in the annual appropriations process, which moves on a separate track. That promises to make it difficult to fulfill all of the policy recommendations made by the House on Friday.

Still, there was one lone voice against the bill. Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., questioned spending billions to go to Mars when "day after day ... we're told we can't do enough for housing and we can't do enough for health care.''

"This is a fundamental debate the country ought to have ... about whether or not to commit these untold billions ... at the expense of other important programs,'' he said.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; mars; nasa; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: demlosers


"Get your ass to Mars!"
41 posted on 07/23/2005 11:21:25 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic ("We must be tolerant and understanding of those trying to blow us to pieces" - Ted Kennedy & Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

Would it be safe to assume you are a NASCAR fan? :-)


42 posted on 07/23/2005 11:59:32 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

This is one thing I think is a good use for tax money. When I was a little kid, I remember the moon shots and thinking when I am grown up, we will have people on other planets. It seemed after we beat the USSR, we put NASA on the back burner.


43 posted on 07/23/2005 12:02:33 PM PDT by Hacksaw (Real men don't buy their firewood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Our_Man_In_Gough_Island
Lost me there.

What I see is an upright torch, symbolizing freedom

44 posted on 07/23/2005 12:21:44 PM PDT by RightWhale (Substance is essentially the relationship of accidents to itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Our_Man_In_Gough_Island
Your upright torch is what the gentleman with the July 3 sign-on date is referring to. It is a bundle of rods, which in Roman culture, symbolized the strength of purpose achievable by concerted effort.

He seems to be implying that your "The business of America is business..." is somehow a statement implying support for fascism.


fascism (fàsh´îz´em) noun
1. Often Fascism a. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism. b. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.
2. Oppressive, dictatorial control.
[Italian fascismo, from fascio, group, from Late Latin fascium, neuter of Latin fascis, bundle.]
- fascis´tic (fe-shîs´tîk) adjective

In my opinion, it is an attempt to be "too clever by half," to no particular purpose.

And by the way, OMIGI, "Welcome to Free Republic!"

45 posted on 07/23/2005 5:16:15 PM PDT by NicknamedBob (Mighty and enduring? They are but toys of the moment to be overturned by the flicking of a finger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: iconoclast
A gigantically expensive space trip in the middle of a so-called war (in which we can't provide sufficient troop strength nor protect those that are there)?

Yep, you would think it was the 1960s again. (/sarcasm)

46 posted on 07/23/2005 8:11:26 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob
OK, Techies, let's widen our education a bit:

The upright bundle of rods surrounding an ax is in Latin termed a " fasces". It did indeed symbolize strength via national unity AND COMMON MAJOR NATIONAL GOALS, and for this reason was also used as a symbol and name of the modern Italian movement "Fascism".

Fascism was in its early phases popular in the West, particularly by politicians such as FDR who wished to emphasize national unity during a crisis. The symbol was on the flip side of the FDR dime. It may be possible - will have to look it up - that later editions of the dime changed to a torch to avoid embarrassing connotations.

Some things they don't teach you in Hot Galaxy Space Comix, no?

47 posted on 07/24/2005 3:41:50 AM PDT by Our_Man_In_Gough_Island
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Young Werther; RightWhale; NicknamedBob
GMT will be the basis for all off planet activities.

Yes and no. :-)

Some satellites "deal" in GPS time. (13 seconds off from UTC)

48 posted on 07/24/2005 6:31:47 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
For the foreseeable future, manned expeditions will use ships time. If there is ever a self-sufficient settlement on a celestial body, they might make up their own time plan as a statement of local autonomy.

Nope. For the foreseeable future, since all exploration will be constrained to this solar system and will be in contact with the Earth, manned exploration will use either GPS or UTC time.

49 posted on 07/24/2005 6:35:13 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob; Mind-numbed Robot
At some point, it would possibly be useful to many who are interested, to have a watch that gives us such an orientation.

http://pocketcalculatorshow.com/nerdwatch/graphics/casio-cgw91.jpg

It shows the position of the nine planets in the solar system, as well as Halley's comet. It also has the dates of all total solar eclipses. Its date range is from 1901 to 2200.

I have one. :-)

50 posted on 07/24/2005 6:46:10 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Our_Man_In_Gough_Island; RightWhale
"The symbol was on the flip side of the FDR dime. It may be possible - will have to look it up ..."

Yeah. Why don't you do that? And while you're there, see if you can find out what the fasces symbol has to do with the business of getting a rocket to Mars?

Maybe that'll keep you busy.

A note to other readers: The fasces symbol has been used by countless organizations, from churches to the deeply irreligious. Using it is meant to convey the strength of organized purpose, not a rebirth of Mussolini's Fascist Italy. -- And now you can go back to your comics.

51 posted on 07/24/2005 7:02:39 AM PDT by NicknamedBob (Mighty and enduring? They are but toys of the moment to be overturned by the flicking of a finger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

You're like a dose of sunshine. You know that, don't you?

By the way, are you sure the dates are accurate beyond 2100? That's not a leap year, you know.


52 posted on 07/24/2005 7:12:49 AM PDT by NicknamedBob (Mighty and enduring? They are but toys of the moment to be overturned by the flicking of a finger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob
You're like a dose of sunshine. You know that, don't you?

:-)

By the way, are you sure the dates are accurate beyond 2100? That's not a leap year, you know.

As far as I know, all date calculations are correct. I will have to dig it out to be sure though.

53 posted on 07/24/2005 7:21:11 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
What a colossal waste of money. This is beyond outrage.
54 posted on 07/24/2005 7:27:34 AM PDT by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob
Scratch a neocon and find a snarling Trotskite.

"Business" is a pretty far-fetched term to use for this overweening monument to science fantasy. The fasces symbolize the policy much more aptly: it has all the economic use of the Pyramid of Giza, the national security potential of the Great Wall of China, the administrative transparency of the Versailles Hall of Mirrors, the humanitarian respect for safe work conditions of the Altar of Teotihuacan, the careful grounding in scientific theory of Stonehenge, and the tastefulness of Il Duce's New Rome.

It is a shame our Congress feels so obliged to play to this special interest that they must Board the Wittfogel Express with a nod to a project that makes past excesses of Oriental Despotism seem...But there I go again. By this time I have at least learned not to use difficult allusions to a constituency whose grounding in governmental theory comes from " Revenge of the Sith"

55 posted on 07/24/2005 8:46:19 AM PDT by Our_Man_In_Gough_Island
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: DaGman
What a colossal waste of money. This is beyond outrage.

We're going to feel a real sense of pride when we look up at the moon and it is Red Chinese, and when everything west of the Mississippi is Red Chinese, and everything east of the Mississippi is Moslem. At least we won't be outraged that we didn't keep our tech advantage up to date.

56 posted on 07/24/2005 9:43:33 AM PDT by RightWhale (Substance is essentially the relationship of accidents to itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

And don't let the Mexicans beat us to inventing an anti-gravity machine. Write that check out to NASA now.


57 posted on 07/24/2005 10:06:09 AM PDT by Our_Man_In_Gough_Island
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
I have one. :-)

Now why does that not surprise me?

58 posted on 07/24/2005 10:12:59 AM PDT by FOG724
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Our_Man_In_Gough_Island; RightWhale; RadioAstronomer
"Scratch a neocon and find a snarling Trotskite."

Somebody scratched you? I'm so sorry. No wonder you're in such a mood.

Or maybe I'm just confused. I should perhaps go back to my comic book on government theory and re-read it.

But I am glad that you approve of the mission. The Great Wall of China did have an impressive security function for a very long time, and the Priests of Teotihuacan never had an on-the-job injury!

59 posted on 07/24/2005 10:51:50 AM PDT by NicknamedBob (Mighty and enduring? They are but toys of the moment to be overturned by the flicking of a finger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer; NicknamedBob
I have one. :-)

Dang, Bob, you snooze you lose.

60 posted on 07/24/2005 3:03:02 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson