Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SALChamps03; All
All fo these complaints about violations of our Constitutional rights are pretty meaningless in the context of public transportation, but they do illustrate a very important point. The whole notion of "public transportation" has no foundation in Constitutional law, since the Constitution could not possibly have envisioned a scenario in which government agencies would oversee the operation of this kind of public infrastructure.

The only "Constitutional" approach to this situation is to shut down the damn subway system and fill all those tunnels with concrete. This type of thing simply isn't conducive to a free society.

244 posted on 07/22/2005 12:11:33 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

I thought about that. No city is under any obligation to provide public transportation to begin with.


293 posted on 07/22/2005 12:26:09 PM PDT by SALChamps03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson