Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYers to NYPD: 'I Do Not Consent to Being Searched'
The Village Voice ^ | July 21st, 200 | by Chisun Lee

Posted on 07/22/2005 11:06:07 AM PDT by BigFinn


Spend $16.99 so you can wear this to your grave

Reacting to the NYPD's announcement Thursday afternoon that police would randomly—but routinely—search the bags of commuters, one concerned New Yorker quickly created a way for civil libertarians to make their views black-and-white. In a few outraged moments, local immigrant rights activist Tony Lu designed t-shirts bearing the text, "i do not consent to being searched." The minimalist protest-wear can be purchased here, in various styles and sizes. (Lu will not get a cut. The shirts' manufacture, sale, and shipment, will be handled by the online retailer. Lu encourages budget-conscious New Yorkers to make their own and wear them everywhere.)

Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly had announced the legally obvious—that New Yorkers are free to decline a search and "turn around and leave." But Lu, who is a lawyer at Urban Justice Center, warned that even well-intentioned cops could interpret people's natural nervousness or anger as "reasonable suspicion." The possibility of unjustified interrogation and even arrest is real, Lu said.

Although police promised they would not engage in racial profiling, Lu said that, as with all street-level policing, people of color and poor immigrants would be particularly vulnerable, especially if encounters lead to arrests.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: baaaaa; libertarianfools; nonprofiling; nothintohidehere; nyc; nypd; sheeple; stupidliberals; tshirt; villagevoiceisarag; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 641-642 next last
To: Stu Cohen

Move to Texas!! Can't search us here, we all have guns and not a lot of public transport. I don't think we would let anyone take our guns. There was a big stink when they made it illegal a few years ago to have an open can of beer in the front seat. :)


481 posted on 07/22/2005 2:08:19 PM PDT by milquetoastdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

"I'm beginning to despise the way I look at people I see out and about."

You should not despise yourself. You're doing the right thing by profiling people you meet on a daily basis. It's a first line of defense and it could be the difference between life and death. Now, if you don't live in the inner slums of America and stay home most of the time, I can understand your guilt. But, really you should not hate yourself, only the enemy.


482 posted on 07/22/2005 2:08:20 PM PDT by TAquinas (Demographics has consequences: Tom Tancredo for President 2008/2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]

To: flada

on civil matters, it exists everywhere. there are no police officers losing their homes and private assets in civil suits brought by citizens for "line of duty" incidents. the municipality pays when such a verdict is given.


483 posted on 07/22/2005 2:09:00 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: BigFinn

I'm stunned by the way so many on this thread just wholeheartedly throw their arms around an announcement like this and declare as idiots anyone who dares to express concern.

I'm VERY pro-law-enforcement, VERY anti-terrorist, and a 100% conservative. BUT, there's a reason why some protections are built into the constitution, and respecting those elements of the constitution does not automatically make one a "moonbat." Granted, the people behind these t-shirts probably ARE moonbats, but not because they see a problem with this.

It is the very height of naivete to automatically assume that ALL policemen are honorable, or that ALL members of ANY authority-group are honorable. This is EXACTLY why these protections are built into the constitution. It's called FREEDOM. The very notion that "if you got nothing to hide, you shouldn't have a problem with it" is entirely antithetical to the U.S. constitution, and it's a bizarre thing to see trumpeted on a board that so prides itself on allegiance to that document.

Finally, there's the reality that the odds of stopping anything via random searches are so miniscule as to be statistically non-existent. It's a knee-jerk move that will do nothing except cause trouble and clog up the arteries of public transportation.

MM


484 posted on 07/22/2005 2:09:05 PM PDT by MississippiMan (Americans should not be sacrificed on the altar of political correctness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TAquinas
>As a New Yorker, I consent to anything that will make me safer

So do I.

Never leave your house. That will make you safer. I suppose you've seen the last of the sun. On the bright side, think of all the money you will save on clothing.

Oh, and wear full football gear indoors. People have been known to slip while indide.

Since you'll consent to ANYTHING to make yourself "safer", I can give you about 1,000 more instructions. Would you like me to post them, or freepmail them.

485 posted on 07/22/2005 2:10:41 PM PDT by Stu Cohen (Press '1' for English)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
I believe the cops are "profiling" .. just not being obvious about it. And .. I would trust the gut feelings of a cop any day.

Well, if this is actually true than good. But don't you think these officers are being told to avoid the arabs, because this would be racial profiling? I hope this profiling is not like what we see in our airports.

486 posted on 07/22/2005 2:11:04 PM PDT by LifeOrGoods? (God is not a God of fear, but of power, love and a sane mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M

Right you are, Sonny M.

Oftentimes, if not most of the times, the politicians are the ones who impede police officers from enforcing the laws.

Thanks for reminding me.


487 posted on 07/22/2005 2:12:26 PM PDT by TAquinas (Demographics has consequences: Tom Tancredo for President 2008/2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies]

To: milquetoastdog
Move to Texas!! Can't search us here, we all have guns and not a lot of public transport. I don't think we would let anyone take our guns.

Sorry, I refuse to move to the state that spawned Destiny's Child.

488 posted on 07/22/2005 2:12:34 PM PDT by Stu Cohen (Press '1' for English)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: Oberon
Because by definition, a random search is a fishing expedition.

So one would think, at least until the black robes get hold of a definition. In recent years, the supreme court has ruled that police roadblocks where they randomly check for drugs or sobriety are "legal" precisely because they are random. I can't recall the cases offhand, but I recall them saying that such searches would not have been legal if they'd searched every single car or driver.

The courts in this country live in a weird, make-believe world.

489 posted on 07/22/2005 2:12:44 PM PDT by zeugma (Democrats and muslims are varelse...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: Oberon

"Because by definition, a random search is a fishing expedition."

Not if you profile and do target searches of the foe.


490 posted on 07/22/2005 2:13:32 PM PDT by TAquinas (Demographics has consequences: Tom Tancredo for President 2008/2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason
Perfect!

Sadly, yes, it is.

491 posted on 07/22/2005 2:13:34 PM PDT by Oberon (What does it take to make government shrink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies]

To: Stu Cohen

Spawned is the right word. It's a big state - you can't watch everyone.


492 posted on 07/22/2005 2:13:37 PM PDT by milquetoastdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

To: TAquinas

target = targeted


493 posted on 07/22/2005 2:14:03 PM PDT by TAquinas (Demographics has consequences: Tom Tancredo for President 2008/2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies]

To: TAquinas
Not if you profile and do target searches of the foe.

Well then it's not a random search, is it?

494 posted on 07/22/2005 2:14:23 PM PDT by Oberon (What does it take to make government shrink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
The courts in this country live in a weird, make-believe world.

Nowadays, non-juried courts are wrong more often than they are right.

Now excuse me while I declare eminent domain on your toolshed.

495 posted on 07/22/2005 2:14:36 PM PDT by Stu Cohen (Press '1' for English)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
We had no reason to profile anyone like that. Israel sure does.

No kidding. I'm not in total agreement with Israel's treatment of Arabs either. But it's common sense to narrow the field down to the most likely suspects and let the most unlikely alone. I do think most of our problems are with our borders. If we could solve them there, the rest of the nation could be in peace.

496 posted on 07/22/2005 2:16:40 PM PDT by LifeOrGoods? (God is not a God of fear, but of power, love and a sane mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

"You apparently didn't read what I wrote. It is the RANDOM searches that are the problem."

Oh, I read it very carefully before responding. That is why I did not mention random searches, but rather "targeted" searches and profiling.

But I do agree with you that RANDOM searches should not be made - only targeted searches with the aid of profiling.


497 posted on 07/22/2005 2:19:34 PM PDT by TAquinas (Demographics has consequences: Tom Tancredo for President 2008/2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: Stu Cohen
Subways are public accomodations in the same sense as a sidewalk is a public accomodation.

Here in D.C., the Metro actually closes down to the public for a few hours each night, so it's not totally apt. In New York the subways are 24 hours so it's probably more analagous there.

Even public roads are pretty much fair game now, as many courts have established the legality of random DWI checkpoint stops. Sadly, it's proabably just a matter of time until it gets extended the rest of the way to the public sidewalks as well.

498 posted on 07/22/2005 2:20:28 PM PDT by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies]

To: TAquinas

That's amazing. It sure looked like you were disagreeing with me at first, but now it seems we're in agreement.


499 posted on 07/22/2005 2:20:39 PM PDT by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle
You don't believe terrorists are already here?

Just for the sake of argument, I'll accept that you may be as inane as that question suggests.

1) The islamotrash are here.

2) A portion of their support network is here as well.

They are allowed to remain here, and move about freely, because their presence provides an excuse (there's that word again) for those who seek to restrict the rights and freedoms of all Americans.

Ideological profiling, internment and deportation would eliminate the need for restrictions on society as a whole.

The islamotrash, as a group, are simply low level operatives who don't even realize how or why they're being used.

500 posted on 07/22/2005 2:21:28 PM PDT by Freebird Forever (abolish islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 641-642 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson