The way I see it, Londoners voted in a terrorist appeaser for Mayor by the name of 'Red Ken' who essentially blamed Britian and US for the terrorist attacks on London. I FIND THAT OFFENSIVE. He speaks for Londoners because they voted for him. They knew what he was all about before they cast their vote. What people in their right mind would vote for a guy like that? Also,Britain was handing out citizenships to muslems like breath mints. A recent poll a yr backed asked where their(Brit muslems) allegence was(their home country or Britian). Guess what? Over 50% said with their home country. Now look at the world of hurt it has caused your country in the name of diversity (I'm guessing). So I'm not sure what part of the exerpt of my post is innacurate. Perhaps I was wrong about what an American response would be to a similar event, but I am not wrong about calling Londoners(at least those who vote as a whole) a lost liberal cause. Maybe is they recall 'Red Ken's' sorry ass I will have a different opinion.
So if you want an apology from me you are going to have to wait a looooooooooooong time. Like never.