[Zee2]

Yeah if evidence shows they commited a crime that would normally be prosecuted of course, then of course it should be prosecuted.

By the way, you do know it was the CIA that asked the justice department to start the investigation. (Not the media, i dont know if u were suggesting it was the media)

[SolidSupplySide]

Yeah if evidence shows they commited a crime that would normally be prosecuted of course, then of course it should be prosecuted.

Well even if it's a prosecution against Rove for outting a covert agent, I'd support it. That statute is not normally used in prosecution, you know. Are you saying that the prosecutor should lay off Rove?

Without qualification, I support the prosecutor. Your qualification means you would withhold support of the prosecutor if an indictment doesn't meet your predetermined outcome.

[SolidSupplySide]

By the way, you do know it was the CIA that asked the justice department to start the investigation. (Not the media, i dont know if u were suggesting it was the media)

I believe this is inaccurate. I believe the David Corn was the first to ask, "[W]here's the investigation?" on July 16, 2003. Do you have evidence that the CIA asked for an investigation before the media asked for it?