Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E Rocc
"The original post said "terrorists and their families. If it's limited to those convicted, we're only talking about terrorists. The addendum was unneccesary and, quite frankly, offensive. "

Nonsense you are being emotional and not logical. in a lot of cases of terrorism family members can be co conspirators. In those cases the similar punishment should apply. Why is my comment offensive this is a debate for goodness sake calm down

2,206 posted on 07/21/2005 11:44:32 AM PDT by Kelly_2000 (Because they stand on a wall and say nothing is going to hurt you tonight. Not on my watch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2203 | View Replies ]


To: Kelly_2000
Nonsense you are being emotional and not logical. in a lot of cases of terrorism family members can be co conspirators. In those cases the similar punishment should apply. Why is my comment offensive this is a debate for goodness sake calm down
If they are co-conspirators, then they will be convicted. To say "their families", even if we only mean adult members (which wasn't specified), we're taking it to a whole new level.

Word mean things.

-Eric

2,212 posted on 07/21/2005 11:46:58 AM PDT by E Rocc (Anyone who thinks Bush-bashing is banned on FR has never read a Middle East thread >:))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2206 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson