Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o

I disagree with this policy, because you who believe that you are bringing American Muslim women into freedom through pool privacy are wrong. What you have here is the beginning social process of having Americans accept the law of sharia and its associated regime of purda. If Muslims want to observe their social laws, they need to do it in their own private swimming pools.


Anyone who sees this " Muslim women modesty " as a good thing do not understand the context. The same laws of purdah and sharia are also used to keep women from having drivers licenses in Saudi Arabia, to be unable to open bank accounts, and to keep women as property of their husbands. You actually are accdepting and reenforcing purdah in our own sociewty. Screw that!

The thinking is apologist and all wrong on the issue generally.Especially the removal of male life guards.
This is sick and unfairly prejudicial against men!

Don't let Mohammed come to the pool. Make the pool come to Mohammed! Mohammed needs to be an American. So does his"modest" wife and children.


145 posted on 07/19/2005 2:04:21 PM PDT by Candor7 (Into Liberal Flatulence Goes the Hope of the West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Candor7
What you have here is the beginning social process of having Americans accept the law of sharia and its associated regime of purda. If Muslims want to observe their social laws, they need to do it in their own private swimming pools.

BUMP!

153 posted on 07/19/2005 2:10:19 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson