Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC radio news and NYT speculate - Bush has decided-Specter called to WH
ABC News | 07/18/05 | self

Posted on 07/18/2005 8:13:56 PM PDT by mysonsfuture

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 641-649 next last
To: maineman

Spector was a DA in Philly...well, ok Mike Fisher was the AG of Pa. How about Mike?


21 posted on 07/18/2005 8:20:58 PM PDT by maineman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mysonsfuture

It's either Luttig or Roberts. Any other guesses?


22 posted on 07/18/2005 8:21:06 PM PDT by NathanBookman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mysonsfuture

Tradesport is heavily betting it's going to be Edith Clement.


23 posted on 07/18/2005 8:21:12 PM PDT by plushaye (President Bush: W-2-4-4!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NathanBookman
Is it Rove?

He'd get my vote, except he looks too much like Porky Pig.

24 posted on 07/18/2005 8:21:15 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Edith Jones, here's hoping!


25 posted on 07/18/2005 8:22:07 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: scott says

yes, that is what scares me. in fact, if the choice is between a bad SCOTUS judge, or firing Rove, let me be the first to say it: fire Rove.


26 posted on 07/18/2005 8:22:08 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
It'll be Edith


27 posted on 07/18/2005 8:22:32 PM PDT by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mysonsfuture

Didn't they just have a big state dinner with the PM of India tonight? Seems odd to pick a nominee after that.


28 posted on 07/18/2005 8:22:49 PM PDT by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

I agree that is likely.

Bush will not want a lull. Very likely he is putting forth that he wishes hearings to begin in August.


29 posted on 07/18/2005 8:22:51 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NathanBookman

Edith Bunker


30 posted on 07/18/2005 8:23:03 PM PDT by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mysonsfuture

My money's on the Nuge.


31 posted on 07/18/2005 8:23:37 PM PDT by July 4th (A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

It's comments like yours that makes me believe that fatso's should be a protected class!!!!!


32 posted on 07/18/2005 8:23:58 PM PDT by NathanBookman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi
How about Orin Hatch?

Oh, God, No!

33 posted on 07/18/2005 8:24:08 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mysonsfuture
Ted Olsen

Ken Starr

Jessie Helms

34 posted on 07/18/2005 8:24:25 PM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plushaye

Redstate.org says Edith Clement had a meeting at the White House last week and a phone call today...


35 posted on 07/18/2005 8:24:27 PM PDT by plushaye (President Bush: W-2-4-4!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: scott says
I hope they do not nominate a "mainstream" candidate as a way of appeasing the RATS and the wolves in the "media".

I believe that would be called a "Neville Chamberlain Manuever."

36 posted on 07/18/2005 8:24:32 PM PDT by Onelifetogive (* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

ROTFLMAO...


37 posted on 07/18/2005 8:24:42 PM PDT by jveritas (The left cannot win a national election ever again and never will the Buchananites and 3rd parties)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NathanBookman

its not Luttig. Its one of the Ediths or Garza or Gonzales. Otherwise, its somebody we've never heard of - which means its Souter II.


38 posted on 07/18/2005 8:24:45 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NathanBookman
I hope that it's Luttig or JRB. Who it will be is anybody's guess.
39 posted on 07/18/2005 8:24:49 PM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

It is a good guess, woman and all, highly qualified, who has written that Roe should be well, reviewed given the "new" scientific evidence since it came down from the guy who gave mediocrity a bad name, LOL, to replace a women. As a sidebar, God, how I loathe this group representation thingie. I would, inter alia, prefer a SCOTUS that was all Jewish and male, as long as it agreed with the Constiutional interpretative preferences of this near atheist WASP moi.) But Bush is a guy who can surprise. He tends to like doing that.


40 posted on 07/18/2005 8:25:07 PM PDT by Torie (Constrain rogue state courts; repeal your state constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 641-649 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson